Local Coverage Determination (LCD)

Botulinum Toxins

L33274

Expand All | Collapse All
Links in PDF documents are not guaranteed to work. To follow a web link, please use the MCD Website.
Proposed LCD
Proposed LCDs are works in progress that are available on the Medicare Coverage Database site for public review. Proposed LCDs are not necessarily a reflection of the current policies or practices of the contractor.

Document Note

Note History

Contractor Information

LCD Information

Document Information

Source LCD ID
N/A
LCD ID
L33274
Original ICD-9 LCD ID
Not Applicable
LCD Title
Botulinum Toxins
Proposed LCD in Comment Period
N/A
Source Proposed LCD
DL33274
Original Effective Date
For services performed on or after 10/01/2015
Revision Effective Date
For services performed on or after 11/09/2025
Revision Ending Date
N/A
Retirement Date
N/A
Notice Period Start Date
09/25/2025
Notice Period End Date
11/08/2025

CPT codes, descriptions, and other data only are copyright 2024 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/HHSARS apply.

Fee schedules, relative value units, conversion factors and/or related components are not assigned by the AMA, are not part of CPT, and the AMA is not recommending their use. The AMA does not directly or indirectly practice medicine or dispense medical services. The AMA assumes no liability for data contained or not contained herein.

Current Dental Terminology © 2024 American Dental Association. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2025, the American Hospital Association, Chicago, Illinois. Reproduced with permission. No portion of the AHA copyrighted materials contained within this publication may be copied without the express written consent of the AHA. AHA copyrighted materials including the UB‐04 codes and descriptions may not be removed, copied, or utilized within any software, product, service, solution, or derivative work without the written consent of the AHA. If an entity wishes to utilize any AHA materials, please contact the AHA at 312‐893‐6816.

Making copies or utilizing the content of the UB‐04 Manual, including the codes and/or descriptions, for internal purposes, resale and/or to be used in any product or publication; creating any modified or derivative work of the UB‐04 Manual and/or codes and descriptions; and/or making any commercial use of UB‐04 Manual or any portion thereof, including the codes and/or descriptions, is only authorized with an express license from the American Hospital Association. The American Hospital Association (the "AHA") has not reviewed, and is not responsible for, the completeness or accuracy of any information contained in this material, nor was the AHA or any of its affiliates, involved in the preparation of this material, or the analysis of information provided in the material. The views and/or positions presented in the material do not necessarily represent the views of the AHA. CMS and its products and services are not endorsed by the AHA or any of its affiliates.

Issue

Issue Description

First Coast Service Options (FCSO) received a reconsideration request to provide coverage for rimabotulinumtoxinB (Myobloc) for the treatment of benign essential blepharospasm in patients who are refractory to onobotulinumtoxinA (Botox). Additionally, a request was received to revise the language in the related billing and coding article to remove the specific muscles listed for blepharospasm treatment. Following review of the literature submitted with the reconsideration request, along with additional evidence reviewed, FCSO has determined that there is insufficient evidence supporting Myobloc for the routine treatment of blepharospasm. Therefore, coverage has not been expanded to Myobloc for blepharospasm. The related billing and coding article was revised to remove the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved specific muscles for injections for blepharospasm. 

Issue - Explanation of Change Between Proposed LCD and Final LCD

Limitation 1 listed in the LCD has been revised and reformatted to enhance clarity and ensure alignment with the summary and analysis of evidence (SOE/AOE) sections. Limitation 1 now reads as follows: “Localization procedures would not be expected and therefore not considered reasonable and necessary for easily targeted muscles.”

Literature submitted with a reconsideration request for the coverage of rimabotulinumtoxinB (Myobloc) for blepharospasm was reviewed. A summary and analysis of this evidence can be found in the body of the LCD. A summary and analysis of evidence submitted with comments was added to the LCD for the following indications: chronic anal fissure, focal hand and limb dystonia, and laryngeal dystonia. The literature received during the proposed LCD comment period related to Dysport was reviewed and added to the SOE/AOE sections and bibliography; however, no coverage changes were made for these indications.

CMS National Coverage Policy

This LCD supplements but does not replace, modify or supersede existing Medicare applicable National Coverage Determinations (NCDs) or payment policy rules and regulations for botulinum toxins. Federal statute and subsequent Medicare regulations regarding provision and payment for medical services are lengthy. They are not repeated in this LCD. Neither Medicare payment policy rules nor this LCD replace, modify or supersede applicable state statutes regarding medical practice or other health practice professions acts, definitions and/or scopes of practice. All providers who report services for Medicare payment must fully understand and follow all existing laws, regulations and rules for Medicare payment for botulinum toxins and must properly submit only valid claims for them. Please review and understand them and apply the medical necessity provisions in the policy within the context of the manual rules. Relevant CMS manual instructions and policies may be found in the following Internet-Only Manuals (IOMs) published on the CMS Web site:

IOM Citations:

  • CMS IOM Publication 100-02, Medicare Benefit Policy Manual,
    • Chapter 15, Section 50 Drugs and Biologicals, Section 60 Services and Supplies Furnished Incident To a Physician’s/NPP’s Professional Service
    • Chapter 16, Section 120 Cosmetic Surgery
  • CMS IOM Publication 100-08, Medicare Program Integrity Manual,
    • Chapter 13, Section 13.5.4 Reasonable and Necessary Provisions in LCDs


Social Security Act (Title XVIII) Standard References:

  • Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, Section 1861(t). This section addresses drugs and biologicals definitions.
  • Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, Section 1862(a)(1)(A) states that no Medicare payment shall be made for items or services which are not reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury.
  • Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, Section 1862(a)(10) excludes coverage for cosmetic surgery.
  • Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, Section 1873 addresses the designation of organization or publication by name within the Act relevant when referencing authoritative sources like drug compendia (e.g., Micromedex).

Coverage Guidance

Coverage Indications, Limitations, and/or Medical Necessity

Clostridium botulinum toxin describes a family of neurotoxins produced by the anaerobic bacteria of the species C botulinum. There are 7 distinct serotypes of botulinum toxin: A, B, C, D, E, F, and G. All botulinum neurotoxin serotypes are understood to produce their clinical effect by blocking the release of the neurotransmitters, principally acetylcholine, from nerve endings.1 There are 5 distinct serotype A botulinum toxin products, onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox), abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport), incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin), prabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs (Jeuveau), and daxibotulinum toxin A (Daxxify) and 1 serotype B botulinum toxin product, rimabotulinumtoxinB (Myobloc) that have been approved by the FDA. PrabotulinumtoxinA-xvfs (Jeuveau) is indicated for cosmetic use only.2

Whether a botulinum toxin is produced from the same or different serotype producing strain, they undergo different manufacturing processes which yield differences in the size and weight of the molecules. Because of this, Botox, Dysport, Xeomin, Myobloc, and Daxxify, as well as other botulinum toxin products available internationally, are not interchangeable. They are chemically, pharmacologically, and clinically distinct.1

For the purposes of this LCD, botulinum toxin injections (BTI) refers to the general use of these products as a whole. Each specific product will be discussed by name. BTI are commonly used to treat a wide variety of conditions in which the main therapeutic effect is to decrease undesired or excessive contraction of striated or smooth muscle. They produce a presynaptic neuromuscular blockade by preventing the release of acetylcholine from the nerve endings.1 The resulting chemical denervation of muscle produces local paresis or paralysis and allows individual muscles to be weakened selectively.

Covered Indications

NOTE: The 5 botulinum therapies are not interchangeable and are only covered as listed below.

BOTULINUM TOXINS (Botox, Dysport, Xeomin, Myobloc, and Daxxify), will be considered reasonable and necessary when administered for treatment of FDA-labeled indications and off-label indications (as applicable) below:

  1. FDA indications for onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) as noted on the FDA website: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=103000 3
  2. Off-Label indications for onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) are considered reasonable and necessary in patients for the following conditions:
    • Esophageal achalasia in the following circumstances:
      • Medically high-risk patients who cannot undergo other invasive treatments (peroral endoscopic myotomy [POEM], Heller myotomy, pneumatic dilation [PD])4-12
      • As a bridge for those awaiting more effective treatments such as Heller myotomy, PD, or POEM10
      • During work-up and treatment planning of definitive treatments for achalasia13,14
    • Chronic anal fissure for patients with inadequate response to conservative or pharmacologic treatment15
    • Essential hand tremor for patients with a high amplitude tremor that disrupts activities of daily living and have had inadequate response to oral pharmacotherapy such as propranolol and primidone16
    • Focal hand and limb dystonia16
    • Hemifacial spasm in adults (cranial nerve VII disorder)16
    • Isolated oromandibular dystonia (also known as orofacial dystonia, isolated oromandibular dystonia, oromandibular dystonia, blepharospasm associated with orofacial dystonia, and Meige syndrome) in adults17
    • Laryngeal dystonia (spastic dysphonia) for adductor type (ADSD)16
    • Bothersome simple motor tics in adolescents and adults when the benefits of treatment outweigh the risks18
    • Severely disabling or aggressive vocal tics in older adolescents and adults when the benefits of treatment outweigh the risks18
  3. FDA indications for abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport) as noted on the FDA website: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=125274 19
  4. Off-label indications for abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport) are considered reasonable and necessary in patients for the following conditions:
    • Blepharospasm in adults16,17
    • Hemifacial spasm in adults (cranial nerve VII disorder)16
    • Isolated oromandibular dystonia (also known as orofacial dystonia, isolated oromandibular dystonia, oromandibular dystonia, blepharospasm associated with orofacial dystonia, and Meige syndrome) in adults17
  5. FDA indications for incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin) as noted on the FDA website: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=125360 20
  6. FDA indications for rimabotulinumtoxinB (Myobloc) as noted on the FDA website: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=103846 21
  7. FDA indications for daxibotulinumtoxinA-lanm (Daxxify) as noted on the FDA website: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=761127 .22

Limitations

  1. Localization procedures would not be expected and therefore considered not reasonable and necessary for easily targeted muscles.17,23
  2. Administration of onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) for achalasia in the following circumstances is considered not reasonable and necessary:
    • Patients with contraindications for Botox or upper endoscopy.24
    • Injection of botulinum toxin in the esophageal body.6,8-10
  1. Treatment of isolated lower limb dystonia and isolated exercise-associated lower limb dystonia is considered not reasonable and necessary.25
  2. Treatment of abductor spasmodic dysphonia is considered not reasonable and necessary.26
  3. Treatment of wrinkles, also called glabellar lines, smoker’s lines, crow’s feet, laugh lines, and aging neck, using botulinum toxins, are considered cosmetic procedures and not covered under Medicare.

Notice: Services performed for any given diagnosis must meet all of the indications and limitations stated in this LCD, the general requirements for medical necessity as stated in CMS payment policy manuals, any and all existing CMS national coverage determinations, and all Medicare payment rules.

Summary of Evidence

Off-Label Indications Supported by Evidence-Based Guidelines

Botulinum toxin is used therapeutically to reduce pathologic muscle contraction. Health outcomes of interest are improved function and improved quality of life.

The American Academy of Neurology (AAN) has produced a clinical practice guideline process manual that includes a discussion regarding elements of recommendations and levels of evidence (see tables below).27

Level (Quality) of Evidence

Level (Quality of Evidence)

Source of Evidence

Level A (High)

  • High quality evidence from more than 1 randomized controlled trial (RCT)
  • Meta-analyses of high-quality RCTs
  • Several high-quality studies with consistent results

Level B (Moderate)

  • Moderate quality evidence from 1 or more RCTs
  • Meta-analyses of moderate quality RCTs
  • Moderate quality evidence from 1 or more well designed nonrandomized studies or meta-analyses of such studies

Level C (Low)

  • Randomized or nonrandomized observational or registry studies with limitations of design
  • Meta-analyses of such studies
  • Consensus of expert opinion
  • Case studies
  • Practice guidelines
  • Reviews


Note:
When there is insufficient evidence to support an inference for the use of an intervention (i.e., the balance of benefits and harms is unknown), a Level U is appropriate. A Level U indicates that the available evidence is insufficient to support or refute the efficacy of an intervention.27

Class (Strength) of Recommendation

Measures of the Risk of Bias

Class I Studies (Strong)

Studies are judged to have a low risk of bias; randomization of patients is effectively balanced between treatment and comparison groups for important confounding baseline differences.

Treatment is recommended/is indicated/useful/effective/beneficial.

Class IIa Studies (Moderate)

Studies have a moderate risk of bias; patients in different treatment groups match all known baseline confounders.

Recommendation is reasonable/can be useful/effective/beneficial.

Class IIb Studies (Weak)

Studies have a moderate to high risk of bias; patients in different treatment groups may not match on all important confounders.

Additional studies needed. Usefulness/effectiveness is unknown/unclear/uncertain or not well established.

Class III Studies (No Benefit)

Studies have a moderately high risk of bias; patients in different treatment groups do not match all important confounders.

Therapy is not recommended/not useful/effective and may be harmful.26

Class IV Studies

Studies not meeting Class I, II, or III criteria including consensus or expert opinion.

 

Achalasia
Achalasia is a relatively rare primary motor esophageal disorder, characterized by incomplete relaxation of the gastroesophageal junction coupled with the absence of organized peristalsis along the esophageal body. The gold standard for diagnosing achalasia is high-resolution esophageal manometry. The treatment options for patients with achalasia aim to improve symptoms by reducing the functional obstruction at the level of the gastroesophageal junction. Though this is an off-label use, endoscopic injections of Botox into 4 quadrants of the LES temporarily reduces lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure by inhibiting the release of acetylcholine from nerve endings.4-10

FCSO performed a literature search in PubMed and Google Scholar for the past 10 years with terms including “achalasia” and “botulinum toxin”. FCSO also participated in a multi-MAC Contractor Advisory Committee (CAC) meeting in October 2023 with CAC panelists experienced in BTI and included additional articles selected by them. Also, 4 society guidelines and 5 additional systematic reviews (SR) were included in the analysis.

Intra-sphincteric BTI is effective for esophageal achalasia treatment but is limited by its short-term efficacy. Four society guidelines (from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [ASGE],6 the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus [ISDE],10 the American College of Gastroenterology [ACG],8 and the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy [ESGE])9 support the use of BTI as a treatment for achalasia only in patients who are not candidates for alternative invasive therapies, such as PD, laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM), or POEM. Four additional SR and meta-analyses comparing the use of BTI with alternative treatments have found that while BTI may provide short-term symptom relief and is associated with low complication rates, its results are inferior in both medium- and long-term symptom relief compared to all other non-pharmacological alternatives.4,11,12,28

The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines also recommend the use of BTI as a bridge for those awaiting more effective treatments such as LHM, PD, or POEM.10

The use of BTI during work-up and treatment planning of definitive treatments for achalasia is recommended by CAC panelists and Katzka et al.13

In non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders, the evidence of BTI is inconsistent, but the CAC panelists support its use. Additionally, the ESGE guidelines provide recommendations for the use of BTI in these disorders.9

BTI in achalasia is safe overall.10-12 Patients with contraindications for upper endoscopy should not undergo BTI for this indication.24 BTI in the esophageal body is not recommended in the treatment of idiopathic achalasia.10 Frequency intervals of Botox vary. ESGE guidelines found that although the initial (1 month) response rate is high (>75%), the therapeutic effect of repeated treatments substantially reduces over time and about half of patients required further injections at intervals of 6 – 24 months with some reporting long lasting effects when repeating BTI after a month.9

A Cochrane database review of 7 studies included 178 patients and discovered no significant difference in remission between PD and BTI treatment within 4 weeks of the initial intervention.12 Four studies included in the review had 12 month data with remission in 55 of 75 PD patients compared with 27 of 72 BTI patients (risk ratio of 1.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.35 to 2.61, P=0.0002]). These outcomes provide strong evidence that PD is more successful than botulinum toxin in the long term for patients with achalasia.

Chronic Anal Fissure

Anal fissure is a superficial tear in the skin of the anal canal. This condition is common in those with a history of hard stools, low fiber diet, trauma, or previous anal surgery. The fissures can be acute, lasting less than 6 weeks, or chronic, lasting more than 6 weeks. Current evidenced-based recommendations indicate chronic anal fissure should be treated with topical medications like calcium channel blockers or nitrates. In situations where patients do not respond to conservative or pharmacologic treatment, local injections of botulinum toxin have been shown to be as effective in healing fissures and are therefore recommended as an alternative treatment. Thus, consistent with evidence-based guidelines, coverage has been extended for Botox as an off-label treatment option for chronic anal fissure in patients with inadequate response to conservative or pharmacologic treatment.15

FCSO received and reviewed 7 studies supporting the use of Dysport for the treatment of chronic anal fissures. These included 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs),31-33 3 prospective observational studies,34-36 and 1 retrospective observational study.37 However, these studies did not provide a sufficient level of evidence for coverage of Dysport for the treatment of chronic anal fissures.

Blepharospasm

For the purposes of this LCD, benign essential blepharospasm (referred to herein as blepharospasm) is a focal dystonia involving the involuntary closure of the eyelids. The orbicularis oculi muscles spasm creating sustained or intermittent muscle contractions resulting in mild blinking or sustained forced closure of the eyes. To diagnose a patient with blepharospasm, clinicians can observe for involuntary contraction of the orbicularis oculi and other muscles involved in eyelid closure, which can range from sporadic and mildly irritating to functionally blinding.

Studies show Botox and Xeomin may be comparable for the treatment of blepharospasm following dose modification. Studies also show that Botox and Dysport may be equivalent for the treatment of blepharospasm. Dysport has backing in the IBM Micromedex compendium DrugDex for off-label treatment of blepharospasm in adults.26 Accordingly, coverage has been extended for off-label use of Dysport for the treatment of blepharospasm in adults.

FCSO received a reconsideration request to expand coverage for Myobloc to include the treatment of benign essential blepharospasm in patients refractory to Botox. A single prospective case series publication was submitted for reconsideration of the LCD to expand coverage.38 An additional search of PubMed revealed 10 studies. Four studies only briefly mentioned botulinum toxin type B and possible use for blepharospasm but do not examine its use in depth; 1 study examined the cosmetic use of botulinum toxin type B, and another study focused on the use of zinc with botulinum toxins. There were 4 other studies that do mention or analyze Myobloc’s use in some capacity, but all 4 studies establish reasons not to cover Myobloc for blepharospasm.17,39,40 The review by Jankovic et al states that Myobloc for blepharospasm treatment has an insufficient level of evidence to establish its efficacy and use in the treatment of blepharospasm.41 Hellman et al notes that Myobloc is available in a solution which is acidic and can result in more painful injections, dry mouth, and constipation than type A botulinum toxins.39 The prevalence of use and level of evidence regarding botulinum toxin type B is much smaller than that of botulinum toxin type A preparations. Hellman et al also point out that botulinum toxin type B often produces more painful injections. Overall, the available evidence both from the submitted literature and FCSO independent review was found to be of low certainty, offering insufficient support for the inclusion of Myobloc in the treatment of blepharospasm.

Hemifacial Spasm

The literature indicates botulinum neurotoxin may be considered as a treatment for hemifacial spasm with minimal side effects. Studies show Botox and Dysport, after dosage modification, may be equal in effectiveness.26 Subsequently, coverage has been extended for Botox and Dysport as an off-label treatment of hemifacial spasm in adults.

Focal Hand and Limb Dystonia

Focal hand dystonia (FHD) is a disabling task-specific movement disorder, that can generalize across tasks and be present at rest. It is also referred to as writer’s cramp, musician’s dystonia, and other occupational hand dystonias. A patient’s history and clinical examination are both critical for its diagnosis and for identification of dystonic muscles.

The treatment options for FHD aim to improve symptoms by reducing the signals that cause muscle spasms. Botulinum toxin injections in FHD require guidance either by ultrasound or by electromyography with or without electrostimulation.42 Botulinum toxin injections dosing in FHD is highly individualized due to different activity types, levels, and multiple potential target muscles with varying BTI doses and intervals.43 Currently, no effective alternative medical or proven surgical therapies have been established for FHD.44-49

A literature search was performed in PubMed and Google scholar for the past 10 years with terms including “focal hand dystonia” and “botulinum toxin”. Additionally, a multi-MAC CAC meeting was held in October 2023 with CAC panelists and included additional articles selected by them. The CAC panelists concluded that BTI should be offered as a first-line treatment for focal hand dystonia. We included a total of 6 studies in our analysis. (Class I and II strength of recommendations).27 They all support the use of BTI as a first line treatment of FHD. Therefore, in the management of FHD, injection of Botox is considered reasonable and necessary as an FDA off-label use consisting of focal injections of the toxin into the muscles responsible for the abnormal postures.

The efficacy of BTI use in isolated lower limb dystonia and isolated exercise-associated lower limb dystonia has a class III level of scientific evidence,25 therefore, coverage of off-label use of BTI is not extended for this indication.

FCSO  received a comment requesting to expand coverage for Dysport to include the treatment of Focal Hand and Limb Dystonias (specifically Writer’s Cramp, Focal Task Dystonia, and Musician’s Dystonia). Ten studies were submitted by commenters for the expansion of coverage of the LCD.50-59 Five studies were left out of the analysis because they looked at dosage changes,51 electromyography (EMG) testing for injections,59 and somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) tools for focal dystonias.57 These topics are outside the scope of this reconsideration. The study by Somma-Mauvais et al was presented in French, and FCSO only reviews studies published in the English language.56 Additionally, the study by Koelman et al was submitted only as an abstract. A request for the full-text version was made, but it was not provided by the commenter.58 In summary, FCSO has determined that there is insufficient evidence (based on the small sample sizes, relatively short follow-up, and adverse effects seen in clinical studies) to support the coverage of Dysport for Focal Hand and Limb Dystonias.

Laryngeal Dystonia

Laryngeal dystonia (spasmodic dysphonia) is a disorder which causes the vocal cords to spasm subsequently causing the voice to sound tight, strained, or breathy. This disorder commonly presents as adductor type spasmodic dysphonia (ADSD) where the vocal cords stiffen and do not open appropriately causing a strained voice, or less commonly as abductor type spasmodic dysphonia (ABSD) where the vocal cords inappropriately remain open causing a weak, breathy voice. Studies show botulinum neurotoxin should be recommended as a treatment option for adductor spasmodic dysphonia (ADSD); however, there is inadequate evidence to support the effectiveness of botulinum neurotoxin in abductor spasmodic dysphonia (ABSD). Presently no effective alternative medical or surgical therapies have been established for spasmodic dysphonia. Botox has support in the IBM Micromedex compendium DrugDex for off-label treatment of spastic dysphonia in adults.26 Consistent with evidence-based guidelines, coverage has been extended for Botox as an off-label treatment of ADSD.

FCSO received a comment requesting to expand coverage for Dysport for the treatment of spasmodic dysphonia and laryngeal dystonia. A total of 6 pieces of evidence were submitted for spasmodic and laryngeal dysphonia including 4 observational studies, 1 narrative review with case reports, and 1 review.60-65 Studies excluded from analysis focused on botulinum toxin administration procedures,61 injection techniques and dosage,62,63 and diagnosis/assessment methods which is beyond the scope of this policy.65 A detailed discussion of these studies is provided in the Analysis of Evidence section, which explains the rationale for determining that the literature is insufficient to conclude Dysport is an effective treatment for these spasmodic dysphonia and laryngeal dystonia.

Essential Hand Tremor

Tremors, an involuntary movement of a body part with relatively constant frequency, is the most common movement disorder. It usually presents as a bilateral tremor of the hands. Evidence-based guidelines from Simpson et al indicate botulinum neurotoxin injection of forearm muscles may be helpful in reducing the tremor amplitude in patients with a high amplitude essential hand tremor that disrupts activities of daily living and have had an inadequate response to oral agents including propranolol and primidone.16 Therefore, consistent with these evidence-based guidelines, coverage has been extended for Botox as an off-label treatment for essential hand tremor for patients with a high amplitude tremor that disrupts activities of daily living and who have had an inadequate response to oral pharmacotherapy such as propranolol and primidone.

The contractor received 1 abstract supporting the use of Dysport for the treatment of essential hand tremor.66 Full text of the article was requested from the submitter but was not received; and, as this text was abstract only and outside the scope of this reconsideration, it was not included in the analysis of evidence.

Oromandibular Dystonia

Oromandibular dystonia (OMD) is a rare neurological movement disorder characterized by involuntary and often forceful contractions of the muscles of the jaw and tongue. Oromandibular dystonia is described by several different terminologies. Those include, orofacial dystonia, isolated oromandibular dystonia, oromandibular dystonia, blepharospasm associated with orofacial dystonia, and Meige syndrome.67 Oromandibular dystonia can present along with involuntary muscle spasms and contractions of the muscles around the eyes (blepharospasm) and is known as Meige Syndrome.68 Overall, half of all blepharospasm subjects experience symptoms to different parts of the body over a period of 5 years.69

Oromandibular dystonia has various treatment choices consisting of botulinum toxin therapy, medication, and surgical intervention. Medications, like anticholinergics (trihexyphenidyl and benztropine), benzodiazepines, VMAT2 inhibitors (tetrabenazine), levodopa, and baclofen have been utilized with varying success. The effectiveness of medication therapy is limited and does not show the same level of value when compared to BTI. Oral medication treatments are also restricted by systemic side effects not typically experienced with botulinum toxin.

The current AAN practice guidelines for botulinum toxins show support for Botox and Dysport for the treatment of OMD.40 A systematic literature review conducted by Hassell et al identified relevant literature regarding the use of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT/A) and type B (BoNT/B) for blepharospasm, oromandibular dystonia, and Meige syndrome.17 In addition to the literature, Botox has support in the IBM Micromedex compendium DrugDex for off-label treatment of isolated oromandibular dystonia in adults.26 Thus, consistent with evidence-based guidelines, coverage has been extended for Botox and Dysport as an off-label treatment for isolated OMD in adults.

Chronic Motor Tics and Disabling or Aggressive Vocal Tics

Chronic motor and vocal tics, sudden and uncontrolled repetitive movement or sound, also referred to as Gilles de la Tourette syndrome or Tourette disorder, is characterized by tics that begin in childhood. The treatment of tics must be personalized and based on collaborative determinations among patients, caregivers, and clinicians. Many individuals with tic disorders have psychiatric comorbidities, which require clinicians to set treatment priorities. The management of comorbid conditions is of chief concern in determining treatment options for tics in individuals with Tourette’s Syndrome. Medications, behavioral therapy, and neurostimulation have been shown to significantly decrease tics; however, these treatments seldom fully terminate tics.26 Evidence-based guidelines from Pringsheim et al indicate: 1) OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) injections are recommended for the treatment of adolescents and adults with localized and bothersome simple motor tics when the benefits of treatment outweigh the risks; and 2) OnabotulinumtoxinA (Botox) injections are recommended for the treatment of older adolescents and adults with severely disabling or aggressive vocal tics when the benefits of treatment outweigh the risks.18 In addition to the current guidelines, the IBM Micromedex compendium DrugDex26 lends support for Botox as an off-label treatment of Gilles de la Tourette syndrome in adults. Therefore, coverage has been extended for Botox as an off-label treatment consistent with current evidence-based guidelines.

The quality of evidence in the literature is insufficient to support BTI for the treatment of defecatory disorders (DD), chronic proctalgia, phonic tics, head tremor, and voice tremor. Further research is needed to clarify the utility and efficacy of botulinum toxin therapy for these conditions.16

Analysis of Evidence (Rationale for Determination)

BTI can improve quality of life through reducing muscle rigidity and contraction and is a treatment for voluntary and involuntary muscle dysfunction. Reduction of painful contractions is important for an improved quality of life.

Dosing and frequency are important considerations. While botulinum toxins have a wide therapeutic window, all botulinum toxin products have a black box warning about the potential for distant spread of toxin effect. These symptoms can occur hours to weeks after administration. Symptoms may include swallowing and breathing difficulties which can be life threatening and can lead to death. The risk of symptoms is probably greatest in children treated for spasticity, but symptoms can also occur in adults, particularly in those patients who have an underlying condition that would predispose them to these symptoms.3,19-21 Therefore, the lowest effective dose that produces the desired clinical effect should be used. Treatment effect can last from 12 to 16 weeks, with labeled use suggesting a minimum interval of 12 weeks. Dosing frequency should be at the longest interval that produces the desired clinical effect.

Medical utilization of botulinum toxins has increased in the past 30 years with an extensive track record of safety and efficacy.1 The mechanism of action is well understood. However, the benefits of botulinum toxin must be balanced with the risk. Professional societies have evidence-based guideline recommendations to assist providers in maximizing patient outcomes.

There are important differences between the botulinum toxin preparations that include potency and duration of effect. They are chemically, pharmacologically, and clinically distinct and are not interchangeable.

Achalasia

BTI in the Treatment of Achalasia

Society Guidelines:

Of these guidelines, 3 were based on results of SRs (2020 ASGE, 2018 ISDE, 2020 ESGE) and 1 was a position statement (ACG).6,8-10 The guidelines based on SRs encompassed open label trials involving small numbers of participants, attributable to the rarity of achalasia and the invasiveness of treatments. Each guideline employed its own chosen methodology (for instance GRADE, Delphi process, etc.) which are broadly recognized and utilized in guideline formation and evidence review.

The ASGE guideline on the management of achalasia 2020,6 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines,10 ACG Clinical Guidelines: Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia, 2020,8 and ESGE Guideline 2020,9 all support BTI into the distal esophageal sphincter as an effective short-term treatment for achalasia, in medically high-risk patients who are not candidates for other invasive therapies.

ASGE guidelines were based on a SR and meta-analysis by Khashab et al of 22 uncontrolled studies published from inception to October 2017,6 in 730 achalasia patients who were treated with Botox injection. Clinical success, defined by an Eckardt score of less than or equal to 3, was achieved in 77% (95% CI, 72%-81%; I 2 value 35; P=0.04) over a follow-up period ranging from 1 to 6 months. There was a statistically significant decrease in average LES pressure from 38.23 mmHg (range, 34.40-42.06) before the procedure to 23.30 mmHg (range, 20.79-25.81) after BTI (P <0.01). At 12 months, clinical success rates were 73.3% (55/75) and 37.5% (27/72), for PD and BTI respectively (risk ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.35-2.61; P=0.0002). Serious adverse events were uncommon, with transient chest pain reported after 4.4% of injections. The authors recommended against the use of BTI as definitive therapy for achalasia patients (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews-2 AMSTAR-2 moderate quality of evidence or moderately confident in the effect estimate: the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different).

The ESGE performed a systematic review (see Weusten SR below) and Delphi consensus and aligned with previous recommendations.9 They additionally made specific dosing recommendations of 100 units of Botox or equivalent of the toxin diluted in preservative-free saline that is injected in aliquots of 0.5–1mL using an injection needle in forward view just above the squamocolumnar junction in at least 4 quadrants. This was a strong recommendation and high quality of evidence, with the level of agreement 100%. A multicenter randomized trial with injection of 50, 100, and 200 units of Botox resulted in similar short-term results in LES pressure 1 month after injection5 and in a SR review, a dose of 100 units of Botox was used most frequently supporting this dosing recommendation.70

The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines were based on Zaninotto et al SR (see below),10 and the strength of recommendation was graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment and Evaluation (GRADE). Based on a moderate GRADE rating of the evidence, the authors support Botox injection for patients who are unfit for surgery or as a bridge to more effective therapies, such as surgery or endoscopic dilation.

The ACG Clinical Guidelines performed a literature review and generated consensus-based recommendations using a modified Delphi process.8 They recommend BTI as first-line therapy for patients with achalasia that are unfit for definitive therapies compared with other less-effective pharmacological therapies.

Systematic Reviews:

Recent SR and meta-analyses comparing the use of BTI with alternative treatments have found that, while BTI may provide short-term symptom relief and is associated with low complication rates, its results are inferior in both the medium- and long-term compared to all other non-pharmacological alternatives.

Andolfi et al conducted a SR of articles published between 2008 and 2018 comparing the effect of different invasive treatments on symptomatic outcomes across achalasia subtypes.4 Their search strategy included PubMed and MEDLINE only. They included 20 studies (1575 participants) reporting clinical outcomes after BTI, PD, LHM and POEM based on manometric subtypes. The authors performed a meta-analysis. Three studies reported data on botulinum toxin (58 patients). Botulinum toxin injection was the treatment modality with the worse outcomes (18% for type I, 59% for type II, and 21% for type III). Approximately half of the patients needed further injections at intervals of 6–24 months.

Gong et al conducted a SR comparing the efficacy of 9 interventional treatments (BTI, PD, BTI + PD, LHM + Toupet, LHM + anterior wrap [D], APOEM, traditional posterior POEM, double-scope POEM, and waterjet assisted [JPOEM]) for achalasia.11 The authors included 27 RCTs published from 1990 to December 2020 with 2278 achalasia patients (BTI [n=158], BTI + PD [n=72]) in a meta-analysis. The primary outcome was comparison of the induction of clinical remission after 1 year follow-up. Results indicated that APOEM was the most effective (rank 1, 50%) strategy to significantly relieve achalasia symptoms, while BTI ranked last (rank 9,99%), although BTI had the highest safety profile.

Leyden et al conducted a Cochrane SR and meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of 2 endoscopic treatments, PD, and Botox injections.12 They included 7 RCTs with 178 patients published from 1946 through March 2014. The authors examined symptom remission rates within the first month, at 6 months, and at 12 months. Based on the AMSTAR-2 critical appraisal tool, the overall confidence in the result of this meta-analysis was deemed to be “high”. The overall methodological quality of the studies was good although the risk of bias was high. Only 1 of the studies included was double blinded. There was no significant difference between PD and Botox injection arms in clinical success rates or LES pressures within 4 weeks of the initial intervention (risk ratio of remission, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.97-1.27) with a weighted mean difference for PD of –0.77 (95% CI, –2.44 to 0.91; P=0.37). Clinical success rates beyond 4 weeks were available for 3 studies at 6 months, and 4 studies at 12 months. At 6 months, clinical success was achieved in 80.7% of patients (46/57) who underwent PD as compared with 51.8% of patients (29/56) who underwent Botox injection (risk ratio, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.19-2.08; P=0.0015). At 12 months, clinical success rates were 73.3% (55/75) and 37.5% (27/72), respectively (risk ratio, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.35-2.61; P=0.0002). There were no adverse events in the botulinum injection arm (total of 151 injection procedures), whereas perforation occurred in 3 cases (total of 188 PD procedures) in the PD arm.

This data demonstrates that PD is a more effective long-term (>6 months) endoscopic treatment option compared with Botox injection for patients with achalasia.

Shiu et al conducted a SR and meta-analysis of RCTs published between January 2000 and June 2021 to compare the efficacy of 8 treatments for achalasia.28 Twenty-four studies involved 1987 participants for analysis. LHM+Dor (OR 2.29, 95% CI: 1.50–3.49) all showed significantly greater efficacy and were at least twice as effective as the reference group with only BTI (OR 0.33, 95% CI: 0.17–0.63) showing significantly lower efficacy. The medians (IQRs) for short-term clinical success rates (%) of APOEM, Posterior POEM, LHM+Toupet, BTI+PD, LHM+Dor, PD, and BTI were 91.1 (IQR, 84.4–95.4), 92.1 (IQR, 87.0–93.0), 93.9 (IQR, 90.2–97.0), 85.4 (IQR, 84.4–86.5), 86.7 (IQR, 79.7–88.7), 66.35 (IQR, 56.0–77.7), and 53.3 (IQR, 37.5–60.0), respectively.

Zaninotto et al conducted a SR with interdisciplinary and international authors to establish best evidence-based principles for the diagnosis and management of achalasia.10 The authors included 466 articles in their analysis. Regarding BTI results, the authors found that BTI has a high safety profile with mild adverse events (heartburn or chest pain) observed in less than 10% of patients treated. At 2 year follow up, only 34% of BTI patients versus 87.5% of the Heller patients were asymptomatic. Similarly, 4 randomized trials and a Cochrane meta-analysis comparing BTI with PD consistently reported a higher cumulative rate of remission rate at 1 year after treatment after PD. Based on the moderate GRADE rating of the evidence, the authors recommended against BTI as an effective therapy (control of symptoms) for achalasia in patients fit for surgery (LHM or PD).

Repeated BTI may be successful if there are contraindications to invasive, but more durable treatments. The authors also found that BTI efficacy may decrease over time.

Weusten et al conducted a SR of the technical aspects of the endoscopic management of gastrointestinal motility disorders (including achalasia).9 Evidence levels and recommendation strengths were assessed using the GRADE system. This is based on a moderate GRADE rating of the evidence.

BTI in the Work-Up and Treatment Planning of Achalasia

Although the literature is sparse with small sample studies, expert consensus supports that Botox injections may be used during work-up and planning of definitive treatments for achalasia.14 Katzka DA et al followed a retrospective cohort of 11 patients evaluating BTI in patients with: 1) symptoms consistent with achalasia but insufficient manometric criteria to make the diagnosis; 2) complex clinical situations in which there were factors in addition to achalasia that may be contributing to the patient’s symptoms and that required different treatment; 3) atypical manifestations of achalasia; 4) advanced achalasia in which it was unclear that sphincter-directed therapy (vs esophagectomy) would be of benefit; and 5) after Heller myotomy.13 Based on the analysis of evidence, this policy will provide coverage for off-label use of Botox injections for the treatment of achalasia.

Chronic Anal Fissure

Anal fissure is defined as an ulcer-like, longitudinal tear in the midline of the anal canal, distal to the dentate line. Treatments for anal fissure lean heavily on adaptations from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Practice Parameters from the most recent published guidelines in 2010 and 2011 and are supplemented with subsequent publications through 2023.71 Generally, treatment for chronic anal fissure is targeted at reducing the sphincter spasms caused by this condition. Recommended therapy includes topical medications like calcium channel blockers or nitrates. For patients who do not respond to conservative or pharmacologic treatment, local injections of botulinum toxin are strongly recommended for relief of painful spasms. Surgery (internal anal sphincterotomy) is recommended for medically refractory situations.

Wald et al15 released the ACG practice guideline for management of benign anorectal disorders which discusses the definitions, diagnostic criteria, differential diagnoses, and treatments of a set of benign disorders of anorectal function and/or structure. Studies show that injection of botulinum toxin into the internal anal sphincter allows healing in 60% to 80% of fissures, and at a greater rate than a placebo. Usual side effects include temporary incontinence of flatus in up to 18%, and of stool in 5%. Relapse may occur in up to 42%; however, patients have shown similar outcomes to initial therapy.

BTI is reserved for patients who fail pharmacologic treatment with nitrates or calcium channel blockers. Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) is recommended for patients who have failed BTI therapy.

The studies submitted supporting the use of Dysport in the treatment of chronic anal fissures included 3 RCTs,31-33 3 prospective observational studies,34-36 and 1 retrospective observational study.37 All the submitted studies were conducted with European and young (<50 years old on average) populations and, therefore, were not reflective of the Medicare population.

The randomized studies submitted had similar limitations including small sample sizes, insufficient methodology descriptions for randomization, recruitment/enrollment, patient populations, and analyses, and a lack of blinding.31-33 The observational studies also had notable limitations including small sample sizes and a lack of comparators or insufficient description of treatment allocations.34-37 Overall, the studies provided to FCSO resulted in a low certainty of evidence supporting the use of Dysport for the treatment of chronic anal fissures. Thus, FCSO considers the use of Dysport for this indication to be not reasonable and necessary.

Blepharospasm

The AAN has provided recommendations for the use of botulinum neurotoxin in blepharospasm based on the following studies:

One Class II and 1 Class III study compared 2 different serotype A botulinum neurotoxins (Botox and Dysport).72,73 In the Class II study, 212 participants were assessed in a crossover design using a 4:1 dose ratio of Dysport to Botox. The primary clinical outcome, duration of effect, was similar for the 2 botulinum neurotoxins. The Class III trial, a parallel design of 42 patients without blinded raters, used a dose ratio of 4:1. Duration of action was the primary clinical outcome, and this outcome and others including number of booster doses needed, latency of effect, clinical efficacy, and adverse reactions were comparable for the 2 botulinum toxin products. A Class I trial performed a comparison of Xeomin and Botox injecting equal doses in 300 study participants (256 participants finished the trial). Results showed identical effectiveness and side effects.16 Additionally, the 2016 guidelines produced by AAN found no studies meeting the inclusion criteria for Myobloc for the treatment of blepharospasm (randomized trials and non-randomized trials with long term outcomes). The AAN guidelines state that there is insufficient evidence to support the effectiveness of Myobloc for blepharospasm.40 Upon preponderance of the submitted and identified literature detailed in the Summary of Evidence, FCSO has determined that evidence is insufficient to support the use of Myobloc for blepharospasm.

The conclusion for these studies indicates Botox and Xeomin have level B evidence, Dysport has level C evidence (see table above). These studies signify that following dose modifications, Botox and Xeomin may be equal and Botox and Dysport may be comparable for the treatment of blepharospasm. Dysport has backing in the IBM Micromedex compendium DrugDex for off-label treatment of blepharospasm in adults.26 Evidence supports the use of Botox, Dysport, and Xeomin as reasonable and necessary for the treatment of blepharospasm; therefore, coverage is granted by this policy.

Hemifacial Spasm

Hemifacial spasm is illustrated by a combination of unilateral clonic and tonic spasms of the muscles innervated by the facial nerve. Treatment choices include oral pharmacologic treatments (including carbamazepine, baclofen, and benzodiazepine) that have limited effectiveness, and microvascular decompression of the facial nerve, which is a highly invasive procedure.

A Class II study comprised of 11 patients was a prospective, blinded trial with 4 arms: a random dose based on clinical experience of between 2.5 and 10 units of Botox, half the dose, double the dose, and saline placebo.74 Patients went through the 4 treatment arms in random order. With utilization of a clinical scale to rate videotapes and a patient subjective scale, 84% had objective improvement with a minimum of 1 of the active doses with a tendency for an improved response with a higher dose; only 1 participant improved on placebo. Seventy-nine percent described subjective improvement lasting an average of 2.8 months with active treatment. The principal side effect was weakness of the face, generally mild (97%). Other side effects included bruising, diplopia, ptosis, and headache.

Another class III study with a double-blind, prospective, parallel design included only 4 participants per group using individualized therapy (dose range 2.5 to 40 units) with Botox in the active arm.75 In addition, 93 patients studied in an open label fashion were reported. More improvement was shown on a clinical scale with BTI than with a saline placebo. Improvement continued for an average of 3.8 months. Side effects, reported in 63% of participants, were usually mild and involved dry eye, mouth droop, and ptosis.

One Class II study contrasted Botox and Dysport in a parallel design without placebo control or blinded raters.73 A dose ratio of 4:1 was used for Dysport to Botox. The primary clinical outcome (duration of action) and other clinical outcomes (number of booster doses needed, latency of effect, clinical efficacy, and frequency of adverse reactions) were comparable for the 2 products. Therapeutic effects lasted 2.6–3.0 months.16

The conclusion of these studies signifies BTI may be considered as an off-label treatment for hemifacial spasm. Botox and Dysport have level C evidence and after dosage modification, are equivalent in effectiveness.26 Therefore, Botox and Dysport will be considered reasonable and necessary for the treatment of hemifacial spasm.

Focal Hand and Limb Dystonia

A Class I trial randomized 40 study participants with writer’s cramp in a double-blind design for BTI or an equal amount of saline placebo.52 The primary outcome measure was the patient’s indicated request to continue injection therapy. In patients randomized to BTI, 70% requested to maintain treatment in comparison to 31.6% of those who received a placebo (P= 0.03). Patients injected with BTI also had considerable improvement in secondary clinical outcome measures including a visual analog scale, symptoms severity scale, writer’s cramp rating scale, and assessment of writing speed, but not in the functional status scale compared to patients who were given a placebo. The only adverse effects reported were temporary weakness and pain at the injection site.

A Class II study utilized a placebo-controlled, double-blind, crossover design for 20 individuals with writer’s cramp.76 Clinical assessment was utilized in selecting the muscle to be injected and the dose of botulinum toxin type A was founded on investigator experience. Outcome evaluations included assessment of writing speed, accuracy, writing samples, and patients’ subjective report of pain. There was substantial improvement with BTI in the objective measures, but not in patients’ own evaluations. The only adverse effect was focal weakness, although this was severe enough to worsen pen control in 1 participant. This study only evaluated the first active therapy session for study participants; therefore, the therapeutic effects achieved were not optimal.

A Class II trial was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover design with 10 study participants with focal hand dystonia.77 Targeted muscles and Botox doses were selected and optimized during a time of open treatment before the trial. Outcome measures were based on study participant’s subjective ratings and observer ratings of videotapes taken during actions relevant to the individual dystonia. Eight participants had improved subjective ratings and 6 had improved videotape ratings with Botox injection in comparison with placebo. Weakness was noted in the injected muscles of 80% of study participants with active treatment.

Three Class II studies assessed technical issues of Botox administration. In 1 trial, a blinded, randomized, crossover design was utilized to contrast continuous muscle activation to immobilization immediately following Botox injection.78 Blinded assessment of handgrip strength and writing showed a substantial increase in focal weakness with continuous muscle activity, but no subjective or objective improvement in writing. In a similar study,79 participants were randomized to 1 of 2 muscle localization methods: electromyography (EMG) recording or electrical stimulation. Injections guided by both techniques were similarly effective in producing weakness in the target muscle. In a third trial, the precision of muscle localization with and without EMG was assessed. In needle placements without EMG, only 37% were localized in the targeted muscle.42

Five publications assessed the use of Dysport for treating writer’s cramp and musician’s dystonia. Among these, 1 was a retrospective observational study,50 3 were prospective observational studies,53-55 and 2 were RCTs.52

A retrospective chart review published in 2005 investigated the safety and efficacy of Dysport in 88 consecutive patients with musician’s dystonia in Germany.50 A baseline assessment using a 6 point scale (worse, no improvement, mild, moderate, marked improvement, remission) was done to rate musicians’ playing abilities and a follow-up assessment at a mean of 36 months was completed to examine improvements after BTI were given. Musicians rated their playing ability vs. skill level prior to onset of dystonic symptoms as 53±23% before, and 67±23% during treatment with Dysport (P<0.005).50 After treatment, 58 patients experienced a benefit with 38 finding noticeable improvement. However, 26 patients felt they had no response to treatment. The study had several limitations including a lack of standardized assessment for musician’s dystonia, small sample size, and use of subjective outcome measures.

Additionally, 1 RCT examined the use of Dysport for the treatment of writer’s cramp.52 In a 2007 publication, Kruisdijk et al reported the results of a double-blind, RCT with follow-up at 12 weeks comparing patients that received Dysport vs. placebo. Forty patients with a mean age of 45.63 years in the placebo group and 47.60 years in the Dysport group who were BTI naïve and had idiopathic writer’s cramp were included. The primary endpoint was the patient’s choice at week 12 to continue with treatment. Fourteen (70%) patients in the Dysport group and 6 (31.6%) in placebo group (P=0.03) continued treatment after 12 weeks. The secondary endpoint was an improvement of patient condition based on clinical rating scales. There were significant improvement effects in the Dysport group compared with placebo on Visual Analog Scale (VAS; P=0.01), symptom severity scale (P=0.02), and the Writer’s Cramp Rating Scale (P=0.04) .52 Two types of adverse events were reported: weakness in the hand (18 patients in the Dysport group and 2 patients in the placebo group) and pain at the injection site (3 patients in placebo group and 1 patient in the Dysport group).52 However, the study had several limitations including small sample size, patients expressing dissatisfaction with treatment, and short follow-up period.

Three prospective studies also assessed the use of Dysport as a treatment modality for writer’s cramp.53-55 A prospective controlled study by Wissel et al included 31 patients with a mean age of 34.8 years old at the onset of writer’s cramp. The study measured the magnitude of treatment effect after injection using a subjective grading scale filled out by patients. The scale ranged from 0% to 100% (20% = no, 20% to < 60% = moderate, and 60%-100% = marked improvement).53 It was found that 76% of treatment sessions produced subjective improvement of greater than 20% and a significant improvement in writing speed (measured using computer-based analysis, 1.96±0.84 Hz vs. baseline 1.6±0.74; P<0.05). However, the study had several limitations including small sample size, large range of follow-up which varied greatly, and a non-U.S. based study population based in Germany and Austria which may not be reflective of the U.S. Medicare population. A second prospective open-label study by Turjanski et al examined 45 patients with occupational cramps treated using 30-440 units of Dysport.54 Patients used self-assessment scales to rate their degree of improvement in writing and amelioration of pain. The study found an onset of improvement after a mean of 8±5 days, and a mean duration of effect in 3±2 months.54 The study noted several adverse events including weakness in injected muscles, local pain, skin hematoma, and finger weakness.54 It is also important to note that 29 patients discontinued treatment at some point after the initial Dysport injection. Limitations of this study included small sample size (n=45), a large portion of patients were lost to follow-up and/or discontinued treatment, and the use of subjective scales for assessment. Finally, a prospective study by Djebbari et al investigated what factors could predict improvement for 47 patients with writer’s cramp between January 1998 and December 2002 treated using Dysport. Authors found a significant improvement in severity and disability scores for patients on the Burke-Fahn-Marsden scale (P<0.0001) and a subjective benefit rated through self-assessment was seen in 73% of patients.55 There was found to be minimal improvement in the primary writing tremor. There was a correlation between the self-assessment score and the Burke-Fahn-Marsden score. The study showed a general improvement of writer’s cramp symptoms with BTI. However, the study did have several limitations including lack of control or comparator group, small sample size, and the use of single-center population located at a French hospital which may not be reflective of the U.S. Medicare population. Overall, while Dysport may offer some benefit to patients with writer’s cramp, the available evidence is of low certainty and indicates a potential for harm. As such, there is insufficient evidence to support Dysport as a frontline treatment for patients with focal hand dystonias.

Because FHD is a rare and heterogenous disease, studies had small sample sizes and different BTI dosing schemes. Most studies used subjective scales involving either patient or clinician ratings. None of the scales have been rigorously evaluated for clinical utility or validity. Whether studies involved treatments or pathophysiologic assays, there was a heterogeneous choice of rating scales used with no clear standard. As a result, the collective interpretive value of those studies is limited because the results are confounded by measurement effects.

The coverage determination for treating FHD with BTI is challenging due to the limited and uncertain evidence regarding its clinical effectiveness. The available literature does not provide sufficient clarity to support or refute the use of BTI for this condition. However, given the lack of alternative treatment options for patients with FHD and the limited available evidence, this contractor places appropriate weight on the expert opinion of CAC panelists who have endorsed BTI as a first-line treatment for FHD. Accordingly, the use of Botox will be considered reasonable and necessary for this indication.

Laryngeal Dystonia

One Class I trial studied the effects of Botox injection for 13 study participants with ADSD, a double-blind, randomized, parallel group study, compared 7 patients who received Botox injection with 6 patients who received saline.62 Outcome measures included instrumental quantitative measures of voice function and patient ratings. Substantial benefit was achieved in the study participants who received Botox injections (P=0.01).

One Class III trial discovered that adding voice therapy after BTI therapy in ADSD patients extended improvements from the BTI treatment.80 One Class III study of 15 participants with ABSD did not observe a noteworthy distinction between using percutaneous or endoscopic injection technique.81

The conclusion for these studies signifies Botox has level B evidence and should be recommended as a treatment option for ADSD; however, there is inadequate evidence to support the effectiveness for BTI use in ABSD.

FCSO received a comment requesting to expand coverage for Dysport to include the treatment of Spasmodic Dysphonia/Laryngeal Dystonia. Two pieces of evidence were submitted for spasmodic and laryngeal dysphonia including 1 retrospective observational study and 1 prospective observational study.60,64

The study by Elmiyeh et al examined the effects of Dysport in managing ADSD. A retrospective analysis was conducted using the records of 68 patients (mean age 54.4 years in the unilateral injection group and 55.2 years in bilateral injections) who were treated with Dysport at a hospital located in London.60 Overall, 272 Dysport injections were performed, 116 of which were unilateral and 156 were bilateral. The study found that 94% of injections were successful with a voice score of 2 (slight improvement) or higher. A lower dose of Dysport for unilateral injection episodes was used compared to those reported by others and still produced comparable results and side-effect profiles.60 Per study protocol, a duration of side-effects greater than 2 weeks was considered unacceptable. In terms of side effects, the bilateral injections caused longer duration of dysphagia, total voice loss, and breathiness, while unilateral injections had a slightly longer period of coughing.60 A total of 13 injection episodes, 7 bilateral and 6 unilateral, in 8 patients caused breathiness for more than 2 weeks.60 The study had several limitations including generalizability issues using a non-U.S. population (UK) with a mean age of 55 years which may not be reflective of the Medicare population, recall bias causing under or over-reporting of voice scores, and outcomes/injection intervals influenced by patient opinions/circumstances.

The prospective study by Whurr et al observed 31 patients with spasmodic dysphonia (mean age 57 years) undergoing bilateral injections to the thyroarytenoid with Dysport.64 Improved voice was reported in 96% of patients with the median duration of peak effect being 5 weeks (n=24, range 1-12 weeks).64 All 31 patients continued treatment every 2-4 months for up to 3 years with continued benefit. Multiple temporary adverse effects were reported by 8 of 22 patients (25%) including dysphagia for fluid (n=5), weak cough (n=2), and slight pain at site of injection (n=2).64 The study included several important limitations including lack of placebo control group, lack of post-injection assessments and recording during peak effect, and a small sample size.

Overall, although studies show that Dysport may benefit patients with laryngeal dystonia/spasmodic dysphonia, based on the limitations presented above and paucity of literature, there is a low certainty of evidence to support Dysport as a treatment for patients with focal dystonia. Thus, FCSO considers Dysport injections not reasonable and necessary for the treatment of laryngeal dystonia/spasmodic dysphonia.

Essential Hand Tremor

Tremor, an involuntary rhythmic movement caused by alternating or synchronous contractions of opposing muscles, is a common movement disorder. While pharmaceutical interventions may provide relief for mild or moderate essential tremors, they often fall short for severe tremors that interfere with daily activities. For patients with debilitating tremors, injecting botulinum toxin locally may be considered before more invasive treatments such as thalamic deep brain stimulation.16

In a Class II placebo-controlled trial,82 25 participants with moderate to severe hand tremors were randomly assigned to receive either 50 units of Botox or a placebo in wrist muscles of their dominant limb. If the initial injection showed no improvement, a second 100-unit injection could be given after 4 weeks. Over 16 weeks, tremor severity was assessed using rating scales, accelerometry, and disability evaluations every 2 to 4 weeks. Participants treated with BTI showed significant improvement in tremor severity compared to those who received placebo, which persisted throughout the study. Four weeks after injection, 75% of BTI-treated participants reported mild to moderate improvement, compared to 27% in the placebo group (P<0.05). Accelerometry measurements indicated a 30% decrease in tremor amplitude in 9 out of 12 BTI-treated patients versus 1 out of 9 in the placebo group (P<0.05). Although BTI caused mild finger weakness in all patients, no severe, irreversible, or unexpected adverse effects were reported.

Similar findings were observed in another Class II multicenter, double-blind study involving 133 participants with essential tremor.83 Participants received either 50 or 100 units of Botox injected into wrist muscles and were followed for 4 months. While postural tremor showed substantial improvement, kinetic tremor and functional assessments saw only minor enhancements.

Additional studies, including a systematic review published in 2019,84 provide further support for the use of Botox in the treatment of patients with essential hand tremor for whom conservative treatment options were unsuccessful.

Based on the studies described, as well as evidence-based guidelines, Botox is reasonable and necessary for the treatment of essential hand tremors.16, 82, 83, 84

Oromandibular Dystonia (OMD)

Hassel and Charles conducted a systematic literature review to give a summary of the history of oromandibular dystonia, botulinum toxin, and its utilization to treat this focal cranial dystonia.17 Oromandibular dystonia has various treatment choices consisting of botulinum toxin therapy, medication, and surgical intervention. Botulinum toxin is commonly recognized as a first-line therapy. This review examines literature describing the use of Botox, Dysport, Myobloc, and Xeomin for oromandibular dystonia.

The effectiveness of medication therapy is limited and does not show the same level of value when compared to botulinum toxin. Oral medication treatments are also restricted by systemic side effects not typically experienced with botulinum toxin. Benzodiazepine use is also problematic due to potential tolerance and addiction.

The authors conclude that for the treatment of OMD, Botox and Dysport carry the highest evidence (level of evidence C for both) and therefore this contractor supports them as reasonable and necessary for OMD. However, Xeomin and Myobloc have insufficient evidence to support therapy for OMD (level of evidence U for both); as a result, they cannot be considered reasonable and necessary for this indication.17

Chronic Motor Tics and Disabling or Aggressive Vocal Tics

Tics, generally linked with Tourette syndrome, are characterized as short, sporadic movements (motor tics) or sounds (vocal or phonic tics), generally led by a premonitory sensation. Current treatment includes anti-dopaminergic drugs (neuroleptics) which are normally successful for multifocal tics. However, the side effects are considered unfavorable especially in individuals with focal tics like blinking, blepharospasm, head jerking, neck twisting, and loud vocalizations, including the involuntary and repetitive use of obscene language.

In preliminary open label Class IV trials,16 the muscles involved in the motor and phonic tics were injected with botulinum toxin and showed an adequate to significant decrease in the strength and occurrence of the tics, and almost full elimination of the premonitory sensation. In a Class IV trial of 35 study participants treated in 115 sessions for bothersome or incapacitating tics, the average peak effect response was 2.8 (range: 0=no effect, 4=marked improvement in both severity and function). The average duration of improvement was 3.4 months (up to 10.5).85 The dormancy to start of improvement was 3.8 days (up to 10). Twenty-one participants out of 25 (84%) with significant premonitory sensory symptoms obtained noticeable relief of these symptoms with BTI (average improvement 70.6%).

A class II trial with 18 study participants with simple motor tics achieved a 39% decrease in the number of tics per minute in 2 weeks following BTI in comparison to a 6% rise in the placebo participants (P=0.004).86 Also, a 0.46 decrease in “urge scores” with BTI in comparison to a 0.49 rise in the placebo participants (P=0.02). This underpowered study was unable to reveal sufficient differences in measured variables like severity score, tic suppression, pain, and patient global impression. The maximum results derived from BTI may not have been realized at 2 weeks. Also, it was noted that the study participants did not score themselves as considerably compromised because of their tics, so their symptoms may have been reasonably mild at baseline.

The conclusion for these studies indicates Botox has level C evidence and may be effective for the treatment of motor tics (one Class II study). There is insufficient data to conclude the effectiveness of BTI in phonic tics (one Class IV study).

Pringsheim et al provided a systematic review of the literature to make recommendations on the assessment and management of tics in individuals with Tourette syndrome (TS) and chronic tic disorders.18 A multidisciplinary panel consisting of 9 physicians, 2 psychologists, and 2 patient representatives developed practice recommendations, integrating findings from a systematic review and following an Institute of Medicine–compliant process to ensure transparency and patient engagement. Recommendations were supported by structured rationales, integrating evidence from the systematic review, related evidence, principles of care, and inferences from evidence.

The systematic review integrates the evidence supporting the effectiveness and detriments of medical, behavioral, and neurostimulation treatments for tics. The treatment of tics must be personalized and based on collaborative determinations among patients, caregivers, and clinicians. Many individuals with tic disorders have psychiatric comorbidities, which require clinicians to set treatment priorities. The management of comorbid conditions is of chief concern in determining treatment options for tics in individuals with TS. Medications, behavioral therapy, and neurostimulation have been shown to significantly decrease tics; however, these treatments seldom fully terminate tics.

The literature shows that injection with Botox are more likely than a placebo to reduce tic severity in adolescents and adults. BTI may also improve premonitory urges.18 Botox is associated with greater rates of weakness relative to placebo. Also, a common side effect of injecting botulinum toxin in the laryngeal muscles for vocal tics is hypophonia. Botulinum toxin effects generally last for 12-16 weeks, after which injections would need to be repeated.

Recommendations based on the guidelines from Pringsheim et al include: 1) Botulinum toxin injections are recommended for the treatment of adolescents and adults with localized and bothersome simple motor tics when the benefits of treatment outweigh the risks; 2) Botulinum toxin injections are recommended for the treatment of older adolescents and adults with severely disabling or aggressive vocal tics when the benefits of treatment outweigh the risks.18 In addition, providers must advise patients with tics that treatment with botulinum toxin may cause temporary weakness and hypophonia. Based upon the evidence and consensus-based recommendations, Botox is considered reasonable and necessary for this indication when the benefits outweigh the risks.

Proposed Process Information

Synopsis of Changes
Changes Fields Changed
N/A
Associated Information
Sources of Information
Bibliography
Open Meetings
Meeting Date Meeting States Meeting Information
N/A
Contractor Advisory Committee (CAC) Meetings
Meeting Date Meeting States Meeting Information
N/A
MAC Meeting Information URLs
N/A
Proposed LCD Posting Date
Comment Period Start Date
Comment Period End Date
Reason for Proposed LCD
Requestor Information
This request was MAC initiated.
Requestor Name Requestor Letter
View Letter
N/A
Contact for Comments on Proposed LCD

Coding Information

Bill Type Codes

Code Description

Please accept the License to see the codes.

N/A

Revenue Codes

Code Description

Please accept the License to see the codes.

N/A

CPT/HCPCS Codes

Please accept the License to see the codes.

N/A

ICD-10-CM Codes that Support Medical Necessity

Group 1

Group 1 Paragraph:

N/A

Group 1 Codes:

N/A

N/A

ICD-10-CM Codes that DO NOT Support Medical Necessity

Group 1

Group 1 Paragraph:

N/A

Group 1 Codes:

N/A

N/A

Additional ICD-10 Information

General Information

Associated Information

Please refer to the related Local Coverage Article: Billing and Coding: Botulinum Toxins (A57715) for documentation requirements, utilization parameters and all coding information as applicable.

Sources of Information

N/A

Bibliography

This bibliography presents those sources that were obtained during the development of this policy. The Contractor is not responsible for the continuing viability of Website addresses listed below.

  1. Walker TJ, Dayan SH. Comparison and overview of currently available neurotoxins. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. Feb 2014;7(2):31-9.
  2. US Food and Drug Administration. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prescribing information for Jeuveau®. Accessed June 19, 2020. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2019/761085s001lbl.pdf
  3. US Food and Drug Administration. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prescribing information for Botox®. Accessed May 10, 2020. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=103000
  4. Andolfi C, Fisichella PM. Meta-analysis of clinical outcome after treatment for achalasia based on manometric subtypes. Br J Surg. Mar 2019;106(4):332-341. doi:10.1002/bjs.11049
  5. Annese V, Bassotti G, Coccia G, et al. A multicentre randomised study of intrasphincteric botulinum toxin in patients with oesophageal achalasia. GISMAD Achalasia Study Group. Gut. May 2000;46(5):597-600. doi:10.1136/gut.46.5.597
  6. Khashab MA, Vela MF, Thosani N, et al. ASGE guideline on the management of achalasia. Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 2020;91(2):213-227 e6. doi:10.1016/j.gie.2019.04.231
  7. Oude Nijhuis RAB, Zaninotto G, Roman S, et al. European guidelines on achalasia: United European Gastroenterology and European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility recommendations. United European Gastroenterol J. Feb 2020;8(1):13-33. doi:10.1177/2050640620903213
  8. Vaezi MF, Pandolfino JE, Yadlapati RH, Greer KB, Kavitt RT. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Diagnosis and Management of Achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. Sep 2020;115(9):1393-1411. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000731
  9. Weusten B, Barret M, Bredenoord AJ, et al. Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal motility disorders - part 1: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. Jun 2020;52(6):498-515. doi:10.1055/a-1160-5549
  10. Zaninotto G, Bennett C, Boeckxstaens G, et al. The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines. Dis Esophagus. Sep 1 2018;31(9)doi:10.1093/dote/doy071
  11. Gong F, Li Y, Ye S. Effectiveness and complication of achalasia treatment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Asian J Surg. Jan 2023;46(1):24-34. doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.03.116
  12. Leyden JE, Moss AC, MacMathuna P. Endoscopic pneumatic dilation versus botulinum toxin injection in the management of primary achalasia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;2014(12):CD005046. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD005046.pub3
  13. Katzka DA, Castell DO. Use of botulinum toxin as a diagnostic/therapeutic trial to help clarify an indication for definitive therapy in patients with achalasia. Am J Gastroenterol. Mar 1999;94(3):637-42. doi:10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.00927.x
  14. Kahrilas PJ, Bredenoord AJ, Fox M, et al. Expert consensus document: Advances in the management of oesophageal motility disorders in the era of high-resolution manometry: a focus on achalasia syndromes. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. Nov 2017;14(11):677-688. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2017.132
  15. Wald A, Bharucha AE, Limketkai B, et al. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Management of Benign Anorectal Disorders. Am J Gastroenterol. Oct 1 2021;116(10):1987-2008. doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000001507
  16. Simpson DM, Blitzer A, Brashear A, et al. Assessment: Botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of movement disorders (an evidence-based review): report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. May 6 2008;70(19):1699-706. doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000311389.26145.95
  17. Hassell TJW, Charles D. Treatment of Blepharospasm and Oromandibular Dystonia with Botulinum Toxins. Toxins (Basel). Apr 22 2020;12(4)doi:10.3390/toxins12040269
  18. Pringsheim T, Okun MS, Müller-Vahl K, et al. Practice guideline recommendations summary: Treatment of tics in people with Tourette syndrome and chronic tic disorders. Neurology. May 7 2019;92(19):896-906. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000007466
  19. US Food and Drug Administration. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prescribing information for Dysport®. Accessed May 10, 2020. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=125274
  20. US Food and Drug Administration. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prescribing information for Xeomin®. Accessed May 10, 2020. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=125360
  21. US Food and Drug Administration. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prescribing information for Myobloc®. Accessed May 10, 2020. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/daf/index.cfm?event=overview.process&ApplNo=103846
  22. US Food and Drug Administration. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) prescribing information for Daxxify. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2023/761127s002lbl.pdf
  23. Alter KE, Karp BI. Ultrasound Guidance for Botulinum Neurotoxin Chemodenervation Procedures. Toxins (Basel). Dec 28 2017;10(1)doi:10.3390/toxins10010018
  24. Ahlawat R, Hoilat GJ, Ross AB. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2024, StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2024.
  25. Romano M, Bagnato S, Altavista MC, et al. Diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations in adult dystonia: a joint document by the Italian Society of Neurology, the Italian Academy for the Study of Parkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders, and the Italian Network on Botulinum Toxin. Neurol Sci. Dec 2022;43(12):6929-6945. doi:10.1007/s10072-022-06424-x
  26. IBM Watson Health. IBM Micromedex® DRUGDEX® (electronic version). Accessed May 10, 2020. https://www.micromedexsolutions.com/
  27. Gronseth GS, Cox J, Gloss D, et al. American Academy of Neurology Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual. 2017.
  28. Shiu SI, Chang CH, Tu YK, Ko CW. The comparisons of different therapeutic modalities for idiopathic achalasia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). June 17 2022;101(24):e29441. doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000029441
  29. Vanuytsel T, Bisschops R, Farré R, et al. Botulinum toxin reduces Dysphagia in patients with nonachalasia primary esophageal motility disorders. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. Sep 2013;11(9):1115-1121.e2. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.021
  30. Mion F, Marjoux S, Subtil F, et al. Botulinum toxin for the treatment of hypercontractile esophagus: Results of a double-blind randomized sham-controlled study. Neurogastroenterol Motil. May 2019;31(5):e13587. doi:10.1111/nmo.13587
  31. Brisinda G, Albanese A, Cadeddu F, et al. Botulinum neurotoxin to treat chronic anal fissure: results of a randomized "Botox vs. Dysport" controlled trial. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. Mar 15 2004;19(6):695-701. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2004.01895.x
  32. Brisinda G, Cadeddu F, Brandara F, Marniga G, Maria G. Randomized clinical trial comparing botulinum toxin injections with 0.2 per cent nitroglycerin ointment for chronic anal fissure. Br J Surg. Feb 2007;94(2):162-7. doi:10.1002/bjs.5514
  33. Jost WH, Schrank B. Chronic anal fissures treated with botulinum toxin injections: a dose-finding study with Dysport(®). Colorectal Dis. 1999;1(1):26-28. doi:10.1046/j.1463-1318.1999.00006.x
  34. Brisinda G, Cadeddu F, Brandara F, et al. Botulinum toxin for recurrent anal fissure following lateral internal sphincterotomy. Br J Surg. Jun 2008;95(6):774-8. doi:10.1002/bjs.6080
  35. Witte ME, Klaase JM. Botulinum toxin A injection in ISDN ointment-resistant chronic anal fissures. Dig Surg. 2007;24(3):197-201. doi:10.1159/000102899
  36. Witte ME, Klaase JM, Koop R. Fissurectomy combined with botulinum toxin A injection for medically resistant chronic anal fissures. Colorectal Dis. Jul 2010;12(7 Online):e163-9. doi:10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.02063.x
  37. Trzcinski R, Dziki A, Tchórzewski M. Injections of botulinum a toxin for the treatment of anal fissures. European Journal of Surgery. 2002;168(12):720-723. doi:10.1002/ejs.6161681211
  38. Dutton JJ, White JJ, Richard MJ. Myobloc for the treatment of benign essential blepharospasm in patients refractory to botox. Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. May-Jun 2006;22(3):173-7. doi:10.1097/01.iop.0000217382.33972.c4
  39. Hellman A, Torres-Russotto D. Botulinum toxin in the management of blepharospasm: current evidence and recent developments. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. Mar 2015;8(2):82-91. doi:10.1177/1756285614557475
  40. Simpson DM, Hallett M, Ashman EJ, et al. Practice guideline update summary: Botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of blepharospasm, cervical dystonia, adult spasticity, and headache: Report of the Guideline Development Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2016;86(19):1818-1826. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000002560
  41. Jankovic J. Botulinum toxin: State of the art. Mov Disord. Aug 2017;32(8):1131-1138. doi:10.1002/mds.27072
  42. Molloy FM, Shill HA, Kaelin-Lang A, Karp BI. Accuracy of muscle localization without EMG: implications for treatment of limb dystonia. Neurology. Mar 12 2002;58(5):805-7. doi:10.1212/wnl.58.5.805
  43. Dressler D, Altavista MC, Altenmueller E, et al. Consensus guidelines for botulinum toxin therapy: general algorithms and dosing tables for dystonia and spasticity. J Neural Transm (Vienna). Mar 2021;128(3):321-335. doi:10.1007/s00702-021-02312-4
  44. Taira T, Hori T. Stereotactic ventrooralis thalamotomy for task-specific focal hand dystonia (writer's cramp). Stereotact Funct Neurosurg. 2003;80(1-4):88-91. doi:10.1159/000075165
  45. Priori A, Pesenti A, Cappellari A, Scarlato G, Barbieri S. Limb immobilization for the treatment of focal occupational dystonia. Neurology. Aug 14 2001;57(3):405-9. doi:10.1212/wnl.57.3.405
  46. Zeuner KE, Bara-Jimenez W, Noguchi PS, Goldstein SR, Dambrosia JM, Hallett M. Sensory training for patients with focal hand dystonia. Ann Neurol. May 2002;51(5):593-8. doi:10.1002/ana.10174
  47. Zeuner KE, Hallett M. Sensory training as treatment for focal hand dystonia: a 1-year follow-up. Mov Disord. Sep 2003;18(9):1044-7. doi:10.1002/mds.10490
  48. Murase N, Rothwell JC, Kaji R, et al. Subthreshold low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the premotor cortex modulates writer's cramp. Brain. Jan 2005;128(Pt 1):104-15. doi:10.1093/brain/awh315
  49. Siebner HR, Tormos JM, Ceballos-Baumann AO, et al. Low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex in writer's cramp. Neurology. Feb 1999;52(3):529-37. doi:10.1212/wnl.52.3.529
  50. Schuele S, Jabusch H-C, Lederman RJ, Altenmueller E. Botulinum toxin injections in the treatment of musician's dystonia. Neurology. 2005;64(2):341-343. doi:10.1212/01.WNL.0000149768.36634.92
  51. Lee A, Al-Sarea J, Altenmuller E. Nonlinear Changes in Botulinum Toxin Treatment of Task-Specific Dystonia during Long-Term Treatment. Toxins (Basel). May 22 2021;13(6)doi:10.3390/toxins13060371
  52. Kruisdijk JJ, Koelman JH, Ongerboer de Visser BW, de Haan RJ, Speelman JD. Botulinum toxin for writer's cramp: a randomised, placebo-controlled trial and 1-year follow-up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Mar 2007;78(3):264-70. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2005.083170
  53. Wissel J, Kabus C, Wenzel R, et al. Botulinum toxin in writer's cramp: objective response evaluation in 31 patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996;61(2):172-175. doi:10.1136/jnnp.61.2.172
  54. Turjanski N, Pirtosek Z, Quirk J, et al. <Turjanski.1996_Botulinum toxin in the treatment of writers cramp.pdf>. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1996;19(4):314-320. doi:10.1097/00002826-199619040-00004
  55. Djebbari R, du Montcel ST, Sangla S, Vidal JS, Gallouedec G, Vidailhet M. Factors predicting improvement in motor disability in writer's cramp treated with botulinum toxin. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Dec 2004;75(12):1688-91. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2003.032227
  56. Somma-Mauvais H, Soulayrol S, Duvocelle A, Azulay JP, Gastaut JL. [Treating writer's cramp: 14 years' experience with botulinum toxin]. Rev Neurol (Paris). Jun-Jul 2010;166(6-7):630-8. Prise en charge de la crampe de l'ecrivain: 14 ans d'experience de la toxine botulique. doi:10.1016/j.neurol.2009.12.008
  57. Contarino MF, Kruisdijk JJ, Koster L, Ongerboer de Visser BW, Speelman JD, Koelman JH. Sensory integration in writer's cramp: comparison with controls and evaluation of botulinum toxin effect. Clin Neurophysiol. Oct 2007;118(10):2195-206. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2007.07.004
  58. Koelman JH, Struys MA, Ongerboer de Visser BW. Writers cramp treated with botulinum toxin. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998;142(31):1768-1771.
  59. Rampim DB, Carvalho LB, Chung TM. Electromyography analysis and botulinum toxin plan in a pianist with musician's dystonia: A case report. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. Nov 2018;61(6):424-426. doi:10.1016/j.rehab.2018.06.004
  60. Elmiyeh B, Prasad VM, Upile T, et al. A single-centre retrospective review of unilateral and bilateral Dysport injections in adductor spasmodic dysphonia. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol. Apr 2010;35(1):39-44. doi:10.3109/14015431003604804
  61. Galardi G, Guerriero G, Amadio S, et al. Sporadic failure of botulinum toxin treatment in usually responsive patients with adductor spasmodic dysphonia. Neurol Sci. 2001;22(4):303-306. doi:10.1007/s10072-001-8172-9
  62. Truong DD, Bhidayasiri R. Botulinum toxin therapy of laryngeal muscle hyperactivity syndromes: comparing different botulinum toxin preparations. Eur J Neurol. Feb 2006;13 Suppl 1:36-41. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01443.x
  63. Upile T, Elmiyeh B, Jerjes W, et al. Unilateral versus bilateral thyroarytenoid Botulinum toxin injections in adductor spasmodic dysphonia: a prospective study. Head Face Med. Oct 24 2009;5:20. doi:10.1186/1746-160X-5-20
  64. Whurr R, Lorch M, Fontana H, Brookes G, Lees A, Marsden CD. The use of botulinum toxin in the treatment of adductor spasmodic dysphonia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993;56(5):526-530. doi:10.1136/jnnp.56.5.526
  65. Rogic Vidakovic M, Gunjaca I, Bukic J, et al. The Patho-Neurophysiological Basis and Treatment of Focal Laryngeal Dystonia: A Narrative Review and Two Case Reports Applying TMS over the Laryngeal Motor Cortex. J Clin Med. Jun 15 2022;11(12)doi:10.3390/jcm11123453
  66. Almendra R, Velon AG, Veiga A, Guimarães P, Silva MR. Carpal tunnel syndrome relief after essential hand tremor treatment with botulinum toxin. Toxicon. 2015;93:S62-S63. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2014.11.203
  67. Ameer MA, Bhatti D. Chemodenervation for Oromandibular Dystonia Utilizing Botulinum Toxins. Cureus. Oct 2021;13(10):e18425. doi:10.7759/cureus.18425
  68. Dresner SC, Gauthier S, Codere F. Essential blepharospasm and the Meige syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol. Sep 1984;102(9):1268. doi:10.1001/archopht.1984.01040031028013
  69. Weiss EM, Hershey T, Karimi M, et al. Relative risk of spread of symptoms among the focal onset primary dystonias. Mov Disord. Aug 2006;21(8):1175-81. doi:10.1002/mds.20919
  70. Zhao X, Pasricha PJ. Botulinum toxin for spastic GI disorders: a systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc. Feb 2003;57(2):219-35. doi:10.1067/mge.2003.98
  71. Davids JS, Hawkins AT, Bhama AR, et al. The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Anal Fissures. Dis Colon Rectum. Feb 1 2023;66(2):190-199. doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000002664
  72. Nüssgens Z, Roggenkämper P. Comparison of two botulinum-toxin preparations in the treatment of essential blepharospasm. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. Apr 1997;235(4):197-9. doi:10.1007/bf00941758
  73. Sampaio C, Ferreira JJ, Simões F, et al. DYSBOT: a single-blind, randomized parallel study to determine whether any differences can be detected in the efficacy and tolerability of two formulations of botulinum toxin type A—Dysport and Botox—assuming a ratio of 4:1. Mov Disord. Nov 1997;12(6):1013-8. doi:10.1002/mds.870120627
  74. Yoshimura DM, Aminoff MJ, Tami TA, Scott AB. Treatment of hemifacial spasm with botulinum toxin. Muscle Nerve. Sep 1992;15(9):1045-9. doi:10.1002/mus.880150909
  75. Park YC, Lim JK, Lee DK, Yi SD. Botulinum a toxin treatment of hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm. J Korean Med Sci. Oct 1993;8(5):334-40. doi:10.3346/jkms.1993.8.5.334
  76. Tsui JK, Bhatt M, Calne S, Calne DB. Botulinum toxin in the treatment of writer's cramp: a double-blind study. Neurology. Jan 1993;43(1):183-5. doi:10.1212/wnl.43.1_part_1.183
  77. Cole R, Hallett M, Cohen LG. Double-blind trial of botulinum toxin for treatment of focal hand dystonia. Mov Disord. Jul 1995;10(4):466-71. doi:10.1002/mds.870100411
  78. Chen R, Karp BI, Goldstein SR, Bara-Jimenez W, Yaseen Z, Hallett M. Effect of muscle activity immediately after botulinum toxin injection for writer's cramp. Mov Disord. Mar 1999;14(2):307-12. doi:10.1002/1531-8257(199903)14:2<307::aid-mds1016>3.0.co;2-3
  79. Geenen C, Consky E, Ashby P. Localizing muscles for botulinum toxin treatment of focal hand dystonia. Can J Neurol Sci. Aug 1996;23(3):194-7. doi:10.1017/s0317167100038506
  80. Murry T, Woodson GE. Combined-modality treatment of adductor spasmodic dysphonia with botulinum toxin and voice therapy. J Voice. Dec 1995;9(4):460-5. doi:10.1016/s0892-1997(05)80211-5
  81. Bielamowicz S, Squire S, Bidus K, Ludlow CL. Assessment of posterior cricoarytenoid botulinum toxin injections in patients with abductor spasmodic dysphonia. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. May 2001;110(5 Pt 1):406-12. doi:10.1177/000348940111000503
  82. Jankovic J, Schwartz K, Clemence W, Aswad A, Mordaunt J. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate botulinum toxin type A in essential hand tremor. Mov Disord. May 1996;11(3):250-6. doi:10.1002/mds.870110306
  83. Brin MF, Lyons KE, Doucette J, et al. A randomized, double masked, controlled trial of botulinum toxin type A in essential hand tremor. Neurology. Jun 12 2001;56(11):1523-8. doi:10.1212/wnl.56.11.1523
  84. Mittal SO, Lenka A, Jankovic J. Botulinum toxin for the treatment of tremor. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. Jun 2019;63:31-41. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2019.01.023
  85. Kwak CH, Hanna PA, Jankovic J. Botulinum toxin in the treatment of tics. Arch Neurol. Aug 2000;57(8):1190-3. doi:10.1001/archneur.57.8.1190
  86. Marras C, Andrews D, Sime E, Lang AE. Botulinum toxin for simple motor tics: a randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trial. Neurology. Mar 13 2001;56(5):605-10. doi:10.1212/wnl.56.5.605
  87. Ahmad OF, Ghosh P, Stanley C, et al. Electromyographic and Joint Kinematic Patterns in Runner's Dystonia. Toxins (Basel). Apr 20 2018;10(4)doi:10.3390/toxins10040166
  88. Anandan C, Jankovic J. Botulinum Toxin in Movement Disorders: An Update. Toxins (Basel). Jan 8 2021;13(1)doi:10.3390/toxins13010042
  89. Aromataris E, Stern C, Lockwood C, et al. JBI series paper 2: tailored evidence synthesis approaches are required to answer diverse questions: a pragmatic evidence synthesis toolkit from JBI. J Clin Epidemiol. Oct 2022;150:196-202. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2022.04.006
  90. Ashford SA, Morris G, Smith MJ. Ultrasound image guided injection of botulinum toxin for the management of spasticity: A Delphi study to develop recommendations for a scope of practice, competency, and governance framework. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl. Dec 2023;5(4):100299. doi:10.1016/j.arrct.2023.100299
  91. Awan KH. The therapeutic usage of botulinum toxin (Botox) in non-cosmetic head and neck conditions - An evidence based review. Saudi Pharm J. Jan 2017;25(1):18-24. doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2016.04.024
  92. Baizabal-Carvallo JF, Cavanna AE, Jankovic J. Tics emergencies and malignant tourette syndrome: Assessment and management. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. Apr 2024;159:105609. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105609
  93. Barbeiro S, Atalaia-Martins C, Marcos P, et al. Long-term outcomes of Botulinum toxin in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: 5 years of follow-up. United European Gastroenterol J. Mar 2017;5(2):293-297. doi:10.1177/2050640616656708
  94. Barbero P, Busso M, Tinivella M, et al. Long-term follow-up of ultrasound-guided botulinum toxin-A injections for sialorrhea in neurological dysphagia. J Neurol. Dec 2015;262(12):2662-7. doi:10.1007/s00415-015-7894-1
  95. Barry JS, Dawson EL, Adams GG, Lee JP. Role of inferior rectus botulinum toxin injection in iatrogenic vertical strabismus. Strabismus. Jun 2011;19(2):38-42. doi:10.3109/09273972.2011.575433
  96. Bellofatto M, De Michele G, Iovino A, Filla A, Santorelli FM. Management of Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Front Neurol. 2019;10:3. doi:10.3389/fneur.2019.00003
  97. Bentivoglio AR, Del Grande A, Petracca M, Ialongo T, Ricciardi L. Clinical differences between botulinum neurotoxin type A and B. Toxicon. Dec 1 2015;107(Pt A):77-84. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2015.08.001
  98. Berard M, Leducq S, Laribi K, Samaran R, Maillard H. Factors associated with efficacy of botulinum toxin a injections in primary axillary hyperhidrosis: A retrospective study of ninety patients. Dermatol Ther. Aug 2022;35(8):e15620. doi:10.1111/dth.15620
  99. Bergfeldt U, Borg K, Kullander K, Julin P. Focal spasticity therapy with botulinum toxin: effects on function, activities of daily living and pain in 100 adult patients. J Rehabil Med. May 2006;38(3):166-71. doi:10.1080/16501970500415348
  100. Berthin C, Maillard H. Duration of Efficacy Increases with the Repetition of Botulinum Toxin A Injections in Primary Axillary Hyperhidrosis: A 15-year Study in 117 Patients. Acta Derm Venereol. 2019;99(13):1237-1240. doi:10.2340/00015555-3307
  101. Billnitzer A, Jankovic J. Current Management of Tics and Tourette Syndrome: Behavioral, Pharmacologic, and Surgical Treatments. Neurotherapeutics. Oct 2020;17(4):1681-1693. doi:10.1007/s13311-020-00914-6
  102. Bilyk JR, Yen MT, Bradley EA, Wladis EJ, Mawn LA. Chemodenervation for the Treatment of Facial Dystonia: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology. Ophthalmology. Sep 2018;125(9):1459-1467. doi:10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.03.013
  103. Bochkezanian V, Newton RU, Trajano GS, Blazevich AJ. Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in People with Spinal Cord Injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc. Sep 2018;50(9):1733-1739. doi:10.1249/MSS.0000000000001637
  104. Braun T, Gurkov R, Hempel JM, Berghaus A, Krause E. Patient benefit from treatment with botulinum neurotoxin A for functional indications in otorhinolaryngology. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. Dec 2010;267(12):1963-7. doi:10.1007/s00405-010-1305-0
  105. Brin MF, Fahn S, Moskowitz C, et al. Localized injections of botulinum toxin for the treatment of focal dystonia and hemifacial spasm. Mov Disord. 1987;2(4):237-54. doi:10.1002/mds.870020402
  106. Brisinda G, Chiarello MM, Crocco A, Bentivoglio AR, Cariati M, Vanella S. Botulinum toxin injection for the treatment of chronic anal fissure: uni- and multivariate analysis of the factors that promote healing. Int J Colorectal Dis. Mar 2022;37(3):693-700. doi:10.1007/s00384-022-04110-0
  107. Camargo CHF, Teive HAG. Use of botulinum toxin for movement disorders. Drugs Context. 2019;8:212586. doi:10.7573/dic.212586
  108. Cavallini M. The setting of a botulinum toxin treatment service. Neurol Sci. May 2014;35 Suppl 1:49-50. doi:10.1007/s10072-014-1742-4
  109. Comella CL, Leurgans S, Wuu J, Stebbins GT, Chmura T, and The Dystonia Study G. Rating scales for dystonia: a multicenter assessment. Mov Disord. Mar 2003;18(3):303-312. doi:10.1002/mds.10377
  110. Cothros N, Medina A, Pringsheim T. Current pharmacotherapy for tic disorders. Expert Opin Pharmacother. Apr 2020;21(5):567-580. doi:10.1080/14656566.2020.1721465
  111. Craciun M, Irwin PP. Outcomes for Intravesical Abobotulinumtoxin A (Dysport) Treatment in the Active Management of Overactive Bladder Symptoms-A Prospective Study. Urology. Aug 2019;130:54-58. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2019.04.018
  112. Cromwell SJ, Paquette VL. The effect of botulinum toxin A on the function if a person with poststroke quadriplegia. Phys Ther. 1996;76(4):395-402. doi:10.1093/ptj/76.4.395
  113. Cutsforth-Gregory JK, Ahlskog JE, McKeon A, et al. Repetitive exercise dystonia: A difficult to treat hazard of runner and non-runner athletes. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. Jun 2016;27:74-80. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2016.03.013
  114. Dawson EL, Marshman WE, Adams GG. The role of botulinum toxin A in Acute onset Esotropia. Ophthalmology. 1999;106(9):1727-1730. doi:10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90360-3
  115. Delgado MR, Tilton A, Russman B, et al. AbobotulinumtoxinA for Equinus Foot Deformity in Cerebral Palsy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Pediatrics. 2016;137(2)doi:10.1542/peds.2015-2830
  116. Denys P, Del Popolo G, Amarenco G, et al. Efficacy and safety of two administration modes of an intra-detrusor injection of 750 units dysport(R) (abobotulinumtoxinA) in patients suffering from refractory neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO): A randomised placebo-controlled phase IIa study. Neurourol Urodyn. Feb 2017;36(2):457-462. doi:10.1002/nau.22954
  117. Denys P, Castaño Botero JC, Vita Nunes RL, et al. AbobotulinumtoxinA is effective in patients with urinary incontinence due to neurogenic detrusor overactivity regardless of spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis etiology: Pooled analysis of two phase III randomized studies (CONTENT1 and CONTENT2). Neurourol Urodyn. 2022;42(1):153-167. doi:10.1002/nau.25062
  118. Dressler D. Routine use of Xeomin in patients previously treated with Botox: long term results. Eur J Neurol. Dec 2009;16 Suppl 2:2-5. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02877.x
  119. Duarte GS, Rodrigues FB, Marques RE, et al. Botulinum toxin type A therapy for blepharospasm. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Nov 19 2020;11(11):CD004900. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004900.pub3
  120. Enestvedt BK, Williams JL, Sonnenberg A. Epidemiology and practice patterns of achalasia in a large multi-centre database. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. Jun 2011;33(11):1209-14. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2011.04655.x
  121. Erickson BP, Lee WW, Cohen J, Grunebaum LD. The role of neurotoxins in the periorbital and midfacial areas. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. May 2015;23(2):243-55. doi:10.1016/j.fsc.2015.01.010
  122. Esquenazi A, Zorowitz RD, Ashford S, et al. Longitudinal Goal Attainment With Repeat Injections of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Adults With Lower Limb Spasticity: Results From a Prospective Observational Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. Nov 20 2024;doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2024.10.017
  123. Fheodoroff K, Jacinto J, Ashford S, et al. Predictors of real-world response in adults treated with botulinumtoxin-A for upper limb spasticity. The Journal of the International Society of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine. 2024;7(1):24-32. doi:10.1097/ph9.0000000000000030
  124. Finnerup NB, Jensen TS. Botulinum toxin for the treatment of pain? Scand J Pain. Jan 1 2011;2(1):24. doi:10.1016/j.sjpain.2010.12.002
  125. Francisco GE, Bandari DS, Bavikatte G, et al. High clinician- and patient-reported satisfaction with individualized onabotulinumtoxinA treatment for spasticity across several etiologies from the ASPIRE study. Toxicon X. Sep 2020;7:100040. doi:10.1016/j.toxcx.2020.100040
  126. Francisco GE, Balbert A, Bavikatte G, et al. A practical guide to optimizing the benefits of post-stroke spasticity interventions with botulinum toxin A: An international group consensus. J Rehabil Med. Jan 1 2021;53(1):jrm00134. doi:10.2340/16501977-2753
  127. French G, Bosch JD, Randall DR. Retrospective review of dosing trends in botulinum toxin injections for the treatment of adductor spasmodic dysphonia in a long-term cohort. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Jan 14 2020;49(1):4. doi:10.1186/s40463-020-0401-4
  128. Gardner R, Dawson EL, Adams GG, Lee JP. The use of botulinum toxin to treat strabismus following retinal detachment surgery. Strabismus. Mar 2013;21(1):8-12. doi:10.3109/09273972.2012.742118
  129. Ghalayini IF, Al-Ghazo MA, Elnasser ZA. Is efficacy of repeated intradetrusor botulinum toxin type A (Dysport) injections dose dependent? Clinical and urodynamic results after four injections in patients with drug-resistant neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Int Urol Nephrol. Dec 2009;41(4):805-13. doi:10.1007/s11255-009-9528-y
  130. Ghasemi M, Ansari M, Basiri K, Shaigannejad V. The effects of intradermal botulinum toxin type a injections on pain symptoms of patients with diabetic neuropathy. J Res Med Sci. 2014;19(2):106-111.
  131. Giacino JT, Katz DI, Schiff ND, et al. Practice guideline update recommendations summary: Disorders of consciousness: Report of the Guideline Development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine; and the National Institute on Disability, Independent Living, and Rehabilitation Research. Neurology. Sep 4 2018;91(10):450-460. doi:10.1212/wnl.0000000000005926
  132. Gilio F, Curra A, Lorenzano C, Modugno N, Manfredi M, Berardelli A. Effects of botulinum toxin type A on intracortical inhibition in patients with dystonia. Annals of Neurology. 2000;48(1):20-26. doi:10.1002/1531-8249(200007)48:1<20::Aid-ana5>3.0.Co;2-u
  133. Gracies JM, Brashear A, Jech R, et al. Safety and efficacy of abobotulinumtoxinA for hemiparesis in adults with upper limb spasticity after stroke or traumatic brain injury: a double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. Oct 2015;14(10):992-1001. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00216-1
  134. Gracies JM, Esquenazi A, Brashear A, et al. Efficacy and safety of abobotulinumtoxinA in spastic lower limb: Randomized trial and extension. Neurology. 2017;89(22):2245-2253. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000004687
  135. Grise P, Ruffion A, Denys P, Egon G, Chartier Kastler E. Efficacy and tolerability of botulinum toxin type A in patients with neurogenic detrusor overactivity and without concomitant anticholinergic therapy: comparison of two doses. Eur Urol. Nov 2010;58(5):759-66. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.035
  136. Grosse J, Kramer G, Jakse G. Comparing two types of botulinum-A toxin detrusor injections in patients with severe neurogenic detrusor overactivity: a case-control study. BJU Int. Sep 2009;104(5):651-6. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08466.x
  137. Grosset DG, Tyrrell EG, Grosset KA. Switch from abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport(R)) to incobotulinumtoxinA (Xeomin(R)) botulinum toxin formulation: a review of 257 cases. J Rehabil Med. Feb 2015;47(2):183-6. doi:10.2340/16501977-1895
  138. Guarda-Nardini L, Stecco A, Stecco C, Masiero S, Manfredini D. Myofascial pain of the jaw muscles: comparison of short-term effectiveness of botulinum toxin injections and fascial manipulation technique. Cranio. Apr 2012;30(2):95-102. doi:10.1179/crn.2012.014
  139. Guidubaldi A, Fasano A, Ialongo T, et al. Botulinum toxin A versus B in sialorrhea: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, crossover pilot study in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis or Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord. Feb 1 2011;26(2):313-9. doi:10.1002/mds.23473
  140. Gutschow CA, Töx U, Leers J, Schäfer H, Prenzel KL, Hölscher AH. Botox, dilation, or myotomy? Clinical outcome of interventional and surgical therapies for achalasia. Langenbecks Arch Surg. Nov 2010;395(8):1093-9. doi:10.1007/s00423-010-0711-5
  141. Harirchian S. Multiple Cranial Neuropathies and First Bite Syndrome after Carotid Endarterectomy. In: Benson B, editor. Dept of Otolaryngology Hackensack University Medical Center2011.
  142. Harris G, Dawson E, Lee J. Botulinum toxin to the lateral rectus for the treatment of esotropia with paradoxical diplopia. Strabismus. Jun 2001;9(2):79-82. doi:10.1076/stra.9.2.79.698
  143. Heckmann M, Plewig G, Group HS. Low-dose efficacy of botulinum toxin A for axillary hyperhidrosis: a randomized, side-by-side, open-label study. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(10):1255-1259. doi:10.1001/archderm.141.10.1255
  144. Heckmann M, Ceballos-Baumann AO, Plewig G, Group HS. Botulinum toxin A for axillary hyperhidrosis (excessive sweating). N Engl J Med. 2023;344(7):488-493. doi:10.1056/NEJM200102153440704
  145. Hehr JD, Schoenbrunner AR, Janis JE. The Use of Botulinum Toxin in Pain Management: Basic Science and Clinical Applications. Plast Reconstr Surg. Mar 2020;145(3):629e-636e. doi:10.1097/PRS.0000000000006559
  146. Heinen F, Wissel J, Philipsen A, et al. Interventional neuropediatrics: treatment of dystonic and spastic muscular hyperactivity with botulinum toxin A. Neuropediatrics. 1997;28(6):307-313. doi:10.1055/s-2007-973721
  147. Helmstaedter V, Wittekindt C, Huttenbrink KB, Guntinas-Lichius O. Safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin therapy in otorhinolaryngology: experience from 1,000 treatments. Laryngoscope. 2008;118(5):790-796. doi:10.1097/MLG.0b013e318162cafc
  148. Hosgor H, Altindis S. Efficacy of botulinum toxin in the management of temporomandibular myofascial pain and sleep bruxism. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. Oct 31 2020;46(5):335-340. doi:10.5125/jkaoms.2020.46.5.335
  149. Hsiung GY, Das SK, Ranawaya R, Lafontaine AL, Suchowersky O. Long-term efficacy of botulinum toxin A in treatment of various movement disorders over a 10-year period. Mov Disord. Nov 2002;17(6):1288-93. doi:10.1002/mds.10252
  150. Jackman M, Delrobaei M, Rahimi F, et al. Predicting Improvement in Writer's Cramp Symptoms following Botulinum Neurotoxin Injection Therapy. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). 2016;6:410. doi:10.7916/d82z15q5
  151. Jain P, Jain M, Jain S. Subcutaneous Injection of Botulinum Toxin in Patients with Post Herpetic Neuralgia. A Preliminary Study. J Assoc Physicians India. 2018;66(7):48-49.
  152. Jankovic J. Therapeutic Developments for Tics and Myoclonus. Mov Disord. Sep 15 2015;30(11):1566-73. doi:10.1002/mds.26414
  153. Jankovic J. An update on new and unique uses of botulinum toxin in movement disorders. Toxicon. Jun 1 2018;147:84-88. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2017.09.003
  154. Jankovic J. Treatment of tics associated with Tourette syndrome. J Neural Transm (Vienna). May 2020;127(5):843-850. doi:10.1007/s00702-019-02105-w
  155. Jinnah HA, DeFazio G. Adult-Onset Focal Dystonias: To lump or split. Int Rev Neurobiol. 2023;169:317-327. doi:10.1016/bs.irn.2023.04.001
  156. Jog M, Lee J, Scheschonka A, et al. Tolerability and Efficacy of Customized IncobotulinumtoxinA Injections for Essential Tremor: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study. Toxins (Basel). Dec 20 2020;12(12)doi:10.3390/toxins12120807
  157. Karp BI. Botulinum toxin physiology in focal hand and cranial dystonia. Toxins (Basel). Nov 20 2012;4(11):1404-14. doi:10.3390/toxins4111404
  158. Kennelly M, Cruz F, Herschorn S, et al. Efficacy and Safety of AbobotulinumtoxinA in Patients with Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity Incontinence Performing Regular Clean Intermittent Catheterization: Pooled Results from Two Phase 3 Randomized Studies (CONTENT1 and CONTENT2). Eur Urol. 2022;82(2):223-232. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2022.03.010
  159. Klein FH, Brenner FM, Sato MS, Robert FM, Helmer KA. Lower facial remodeling with botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of masseter hypertrophy. An Bras Dermatol. Nov-Dec 2014;89(6):878-84. doi:10.1590/abd1806-4841.20143200
  160. Kohli N, Blitzer A. Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Motor and Phonic Tics: A Case Report. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. Jun 2020;129(6):625-627. doi:10.1177/0003489419898211
  161. Koshy JC, Sharabi SE, Feldman EM, Hollier LH, Jr., Patrinely JR, Soparkar CN. Effect of dietary zinc and phytase supplementation on botulinum toxin treatments. J Drugs Dermatol. Apr 2012;11(4):507-12.
  162. Kotby MN, Baraka M, El Sady SR, Ghanem M, Shoeib R. Psychogenic stress as a possible etiological factor in non-organic dysphonia. International Congress Series. 2003;1240:1251-1256. doi:10.1016/s0531-5131(03)00858-6
  163. Kutuk SG, Ozkan Y, Kutuk M, Ozdas T. Comparison of the Efficacies of Dry Needling and Botox Methods in the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome Affecting the Temporomandibular Joint. J Craniofac Surg. Jul 2019;30(5):1556-1559. doi:10.1097/SCS.0000000000005473
  164. Lakraj AA, Moghimi N, Jabbari B. Hyperhidrosis: anatomy, pathophysiology and treatment with emphasis on the role of botulinum toxins. Toxins (Basel). Apr 23 2013;5(4):821-40. doi:10.3390/toxins5040821
  165. Lee JH, Lee S-H, Song SH. Clinical effectiveness of botulinum toxin A compared to a mixture of steroid and local anesthetics as a treatment for sacroiliac joint pain. Pain Med. 2010;11(5):692-700. doi:10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00838.x
  166. Lee SJ, McCall WD, Kim YK, Chung SC, Chung JW. Effect of botulinum toxin injection on nocturnal bruxism: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89(1):16-23. doi:10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181bc0c78
  167. Lees AJ, Turjanski N, Whurr R, Rivest J, Lorch M, Brookes G. Treatment of cervical dystonia hand spasms and laryngeal dystonia with botulinum toxin. J Neurol. 1991;239(1):1-4. doi:10.1007/BF00839202
  168. Lotia M, Jankovic J. Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Tremor and Tics. Semin Neurol. Feb 2016;36(1):54-63. doi:10.1055/s-0035-1571217
  169. Lungu C, Karp BI, Alter K, Zolbrod R, Hallett M. Long-term follow-up of botulinum toxin therapy for focal hand dystonia: outcome at 10 years or more. Mov Disord. Mar 2011;26(4):750-3. doi:10.1002/mds.23504
  170. Machado D, Kumar A, Jabbari B. Abobotulinum Toxin A in the Treatment of Chronic Low Back Pain. Toxins (Basel). Dec 15 2016;8(12)doi:10.3390/toxins8120374
  171. Mancini F, Zangaglia R, Cristina S, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of drooling in parkinsonism. Mov Disord. Jun 2003;18(6):685-8. doi:10.1002/mds.10420
  172. Manzano FS, Granero LM, Masiero D, dos Maria TB. Treatment of muscle spasticity in patients with cerebral palsy using BTX-A: a pilot study. Spec Care Dentist. 2004;24(4):235-239. doi:10.1111/j.1754-4505.2004.tb01699.x
  173. Marchiori C, Roche N, Vuillerme N, Zory R, Pradon D. Effect of multisite botulinum toxin injections on gait quality in adults with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(23):1971-4. doi:10.3109/09638288.2014.883443
  174. Marco E, Duarte E, Vila J, et al. Is botulinum toxin type A effective in the treatment of spastic shoulder pain in patients after stroke? A double-blind randomized clinical trial. J Rehabil Med. Jul 2007;39(6):440-7. doi:10.2340/16501977-0066
  175. Mazlan M, Rajasegaran S, Engkasan JP, Nawawi O, Goh KJ, Freddy SJ. A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating the Most Efficacious Dose of Botulinum Toxin-A for Sialorrhea Treatment in Asian Adults with Neurological Diseases. Toxins (Basel). Sep 22 2015;7(9):3758-70. doi:10.3390/toxins7093758
  176. Mittal SO, Machado D, Richardson D, Dubey D, Jabbari B. Botulinum toxin in essential hand tremor - A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study with customized injection approach. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. Nov 2018;56:65-69. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2018.06.019
  177. Mittal SO, Jog M, Lee J, Jabbari B. Novel Botulinum Toxin Injection Protocols for Parkinson Tremor and Essential Tremor - the Yale Technique and Sensor-Based Kinematics Procedure for Safe and Effective Treatment. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y). Dec 31 2020;10:61. doi:10.5334/tohm.582
  178. Montaser-Kouhsari L, Zartab H, Fanian F, et al. Comparison of intradermal injection with iontophoresis of abobotulinum toxin A for the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis: a randomized, controlled trial. J Dermatolog Treat. Aug 2014;25(4):337-41. doi:10.3109/09546634.2012.739679
  179. Müller J, Wenning GK, Wissel J, Seppi K, Poewe W. Botulinum toxin treatment in atypical parkinsonian disorders associated with disabling focal dystonia. J Neurol. Mar 2002;249(3):300-4. doi:10.1007/s004150200009
  180. Naumann M, Reiners K. Long-latency reflexes of hand muscles in idiopathic focal dystonia and their modification by botulinum toxin. Brain. Mar 1997;120 ( Pt 3):409-16. doi:10.1093/brain/120.3.409
  181. Naumann M, Dressler D, Hallett M, et al. Evidence-based review and assessment of botulinum neurotoxin for the treatment of secretory disorders. Toxicon. Jun 1 2013;67:141-52. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2012.10.020
  182. Niemann N, Jankovic J. Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Hand Tremor. Toxins (Basel). Jul 19 2018;10(7)doi:10.3390/toxins10070299
  183. Pandey S. A practical approach to management of focal hand dystonia. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. Apr-Jun 2015;18(2):146-53. doi:10.4103/0972-2327.156563
  184. Pandey S, Srivanitchapoom P, Kirubakaran R, Berman BD. Botulinum toxin for motor and phonic tics in Tourette's syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. Jan 5 2018;1(1):CD012285. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD012285.pub2
  185. Pandey S, Dash D. Progress in Pharmacological and Surgical Management of Tourette Syndrome and Other Chronic Tic Disorders. Neurologist. May 2019;24(3):93-108. doi:10.1097/NRL.0000000000000218
  186. Pandolfino JE, Kwiatek MA, Nealis T, Bulsiewicz W, Post J, Kahrilas PJ. Achalasia: a new clinically relevant classification by high-resolution manometry. Gastroenterology. Nov 2008;135(5):1526-33. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2008.07.022
  187. Patki PS, Hamid R, Arumugam K, Shah PJ, Craggs M. Botulinum toxin-type A in the treatment of drug-resistant neurogenic detrusor overactivity secondary to traumatic spinal cord injury. BJU Int. Jul 2006;98(1):77-82. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06192.x
  188. Paul A, Kranz GS, Schindl A. Diode laser hair removal does not interfere with botulinum toxin A treatment against axillary hyperhidrosis. Lasers Surg Med. 2010;42(3):211-214. doi:10.1002/lsm.20891
  189. Persaud R, Garas G, Silva S, Stamatoglou C, Chatrath P, Patel K. An evidence-based review of botulinum toxin (Botox) applications in non-cosmetic head and neck conditions. JRSM Short Rep. Feb 2013;4(2):10. doi:10.1177/2042533312472115
  190. Petracca M, Guidubaldi A, Ricciardi L, et al. Botulinum Toxin A and B in sialorrhea: Long-term data and literature overview. Toxicon. Dec 1 2015;107(Pt A):129-40. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2015.08.014
  191. Piccinni G, Poli E, Angrisano A, Sciusco A, Testini M. Botox for chronic anal fissure: is it useful? A clinical experience with mid-term follow-up. Acta Biomed. 2009;80(3):238-42.
  192. Quezada J, Coffman KA. Current Approaches and New Developments in the Pharmacological Management of Tourette Syndrome. CNS Drugs. Jan 2018;32(1):33-45. doi:10.1007/s40263-017-0486-0
  193. Rahnama'i MS, Salehi-Pourmehr H, Saeedi S, Tayebi S, Hajebrahimi S. Intravesical Injection of Abobotulinumtoxin-A in Patients with Bladder Pain Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis. Urol Res Pract. May 2023;49(3):205-210. doi:10.5152/tud.2023.22243
  194. Rahnama'i MS, Bagheri A, Jahantabi E, et al. Long-term follow-up of intravesical abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport(R)) injections in women with idiopathic detrusor overactivity. Asian J Urol. Jan 2024;11(1):93-98. doi:10.1016/j.ajur.2022.02.012
  195. Ramos VF, Karp BI, Hallett M. Tricks in dystonia: ordering the complexity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Sep 2014;85(9):987-93. doi:10.1136/jnnp-2013-306971
  196. Rezazadeh F, Esnaashari N, Azad A, Emad S. The effects of botulinum toxin A injection on the lateral pterygoid muscle in patients with a painful temporomandibular joint click: a randomized clinical trial study. BMC Oral Health. May 31 2022;22(1):217. doi:10.1186/s12903-022-02220-3
  197. Rivelis Y, Zafar N, Morice K. Spasticity. StatPearls Publishing LLC. Updated August 8, 2023.
  198. Rodgers HC, Moorthy K. Randomized clinical trial comparing feeding jejunostomy with nasoduodenal tube placement in patients undergoing oesophagectomy (Br J Surg 2007; 94: 31-35). Br J Surg. May 2007;94(5):645-6; author reply 646. doi:10.1002/bjs.5875
  199. Roessner V, Eichele H, Stern JS, et al. European clinical guidelines for Tourette syndrome and other tic disorders-version 2.0. Part III: pharmacological treatment. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. Mar 2022;31(3):425-441. doi:10.1007/s00787-021-01899-z
  200. Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol Suppl. 2007;109:8-14.
  201. Roth J. The colorful spectrum of Tourette syndrome and its medical, surgical and behavioral therapies. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. Jan 2018;46 Suppl 1:S75-S79. doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.08.004
  202. Ruffion A, Capelle O, Paparel P, Leriche B, Leriche A, Grise P. What is the optimum dose of type A botulinum toxin for treating neurogenic bladder overactivity? BJU Int. May 2006;97(5):1030-4. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2006.06091.x
  203. Safarpour Y, Jabbari B. Botulinum Toxin Treatment of Movement Disorders. Curr Treat Options Neurol. Feb 24 2018;20(2):4. doi:10.1007/s11940-018-0488-3
  204. Salehi H, Moussaei M, Kamiab Z, Vakilian A. The effects of botulinum toxin type A injection on pain symptoms, quality of life, and sleep quality of patients with diabetic neuropathy: A randomized double-blind clinical trial. Iran J Neurol. 2019;18(3):99-107.
  205. Sanjari MS, Falavarjani KG, Kashkouli MB, Aghai GH, Nojomi M, Rostami H. Botulinum toxin injection with and without electromyographic assistance for treatment of abducens nerve palsy: a pilot study. J AAPOS. 2008;12(3):259-262. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2007.11.006
  206. Schneider SA, Edwards MJ, Grill SE, et al. Adult-onset primary lower limb dystonia. Mov Disord. Jun 2006;21(6):767-71. doi:10.1002/mds.20794
  207. Schnider P, Binder M, Kittler H, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of botulinum A toxin for severe axillary hyperhidrosis. Br J Dermatol. 1998;140(4):677-680. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.02769.x
  208. Schnider P, Moraru E, Kittler H, Binder M, Kranz G, Auff E. Treatment of focal hyperhidrosis with botulinum toxin type A: long-term follow-up in 61 patients. Br J Dermatol. 2001;145(2):289-293. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2133.2001.04349.x
  209. Sidebottom AJ, Patel AA, Amin J. Botulinum injection for the management of myofascial pain in the masticatory muscles. A prospective outcome study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. Apr 2013;51(3):199-205. doi:10.1016/j.bjoms.2012.07.002
  210. Smith CP, Radziszewski P, Borkowski A, Somogyi GT, Boone TB, Chancellor MB. Botulinum toxin a has antinociceptive effects in treating interstitial cystitis. Urology. Nov 2004;64(5):871-5; discussion 875. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.073
  211. Solebo AL, Austin AM, Theodorou M, Timms C, Hancox J, Adams GGW. Botulinum toxin chemodenervation for childhood strabismus in England: National and local patterns of practice. PLoS One. 2018;13(6):e0199074. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0199074
  212. Stachler RJ, Francis DO, Schwartz SR, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline: Hoarseness (Dysphonia) (Update). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. Mar 2018;158(1_suppl):S1-S42. doi:10.1177/0194599817751030
  213. Stowers JA, Day D, Alter K. Cervical Dystonia. PM&R. Updated November 10, 2023. 2025.
  214. Svetel M, Vasic M, Dragasevic N, Pekmezovic T. Botulinum toxin in the treatment of sialorrhea. Vojnosanit Pregl. 2009;66(1):9-12. doi:10.2298/vsp0901009s
  215. Talarico-Filho S, Mendonca DONM, Sperandeo DEMF, C DESP. A double-blind, randomized, comparative study of two type A botulinum toxins in the treatment of primary axillary hyperhidrosis. Dermatol Surg. Jan 2007;33(1 Spec No.):S44-50. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.2006.32331.x
  216. Talebnejad MR, Sharifi M, Nowroozzadeh MH. The role of Botulinum toxin in management of acute traumatic third-nerve palsy. J AAPOS. 2008;12(5):510-513. doi:10.1016/j.jaapos.2008.03.009
  217. Tambasco N, Filidei M, Nigro P, Parnetti L, Simoni S. Botulinum Toxin for the Treatment of Hemifacial Spasm: An Update on Clinical Studies. Toxins (Basel). Dec 9 2021;13(12)doi:10.3390/toxins13120881
  218. Tarsy D, Sudarsky L, Charness ME. Limb dystonia following electrical injury. Mov Disord. Mar 1994;9(2):230-2. doi:10.1002/mds.870090220
  219. Tater P, Pandey S. Botulinum toxin in movement disorders. Neurol India. Mar-Apr 2018;66(Supplement):S79-S89. doi:10.4103/0028-3886.226441
  220. Thenganatt MA, Jankovic J. Recent Advances in Understanding and Managing Tourette Syndrome. F1000Res. 2016;5doi:10.12688/f1000research.7424.1
  221. Troung DD, Rontal M, Rolnick M, Aronson AE, Mistura K. Double-blind controlled study of botulinum toxin in adductor spasmodic dysphonia. Laryngoscope. Jun 1991;101(6 Pt 1):630-4. doi:10.1288/00005537-199106000-00010
  222. Turner-Stokes L, Fheodoroff K, Jacinto J, Maisonobe P. Results from the Upper Limb International Spasticity Study-II (ULISII):a large, international, prospective cohort study investigating practice and goal attainment following treatment with botulinum toxin A in real-life clinical management. BMJ Open. Jun 20 2013;3(6)doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-002771
  223. Turner-Stokes L, Jacinto J, Fheodoroff K, et al. Longitudinal goal attainment with integrated upper limb spasticity management including repeat injections of botulinum toxin A: Findings from the prospective, observational Upper Limb International Spasticity (ULIS-III) cohort study. J Rehabil Med. Feb 24 2021;53(2):jrm00157. doi:10.2340/16501977-2801
  224. Unti E, Mazzucchi S, Calabrese R, et al. Botulinum toxin for the treatment of dystonia and pain in corticobasal syndrome. Brain Behav. Jun 2019;9(6):e01182. doi:10.1002/brb3.1182
  225. Vanek Z, Jankovic J. Dystonia in corticobasal degeneration. Mov Disord. Mar 2001;16(2):252-7. doi:10.1002/mds.1038
  226. Verduzco-Gutierrez M, Raghavan P, Pruente J, et al. AAPM&R consensus guidance on spasticity assessment and management. PM R. Aug 2024;16(8):864-887. doi:10.1002/pmrj.13211
  227. von Lindern JJ. Type A botulinum toxin in the treatment of chronic facial pain associated with temporo-mandibular dysfunction. Acta Neurol Belg. 2001;101(1):39-41.
  228. Wabbels B, Jost WH, Roggenkamper P. Difficulties with differentiating botulinum toxin treatment effects in essential blepharospasm. J Neural Transm (Vienna). Jun 2011;118(6):925-43. doi:10.1007/s00702-010-0546-9
  229. Ward AB, Molenaers G, Colosimo C, Berardelli A. Clinical value of botulinum toxin in neurological indications. Eur J Neurol. Dec 2006;13 Suppl 4:20-6. doi:10.1111/j.1468-1331.2006.01650.x
  230. Wittekindt C, Liu WC, Preuss SF, Guntinas-Lichius O. Botulinum toxin A for neuropathic pain after neck dissection: a dose-finding study. Laryngoscope. Jul 2006;116(7):1168-71. doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000217797.05523.75
  231. Yelnik AP, Colle FM, Bonan IV, Vicaut E. Treatment of shoulder pain in spastic hemiplegia by reducing spasticity of the subscapular muscle: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled study of botulinum toxin A. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. Aug 2007;78(8):845-8. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2006.103341
  232. Yiannakopoulou E. Botulinum toxin and anal fissure: efficacy and safety systematic review. Int J Colorectal Dis. Jan 2012;27(1):1-9. doi:10.1007/s00384-011-1286-5
  233. Yoon SJ, Ho J, Kang HY, et al. Low-dose botulinum toxin type A for the treatment of refractory piriformis syndrome. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27(5):657-665. doi:10.1592/phco.27.5.657
  234. Zakin E, Simpson D. Evidence on botulinum toxin in selected disorders. Toxicon. Jun 1 2018;147:134-140. doi:10.1016/j.toxicon.2018.01.019
  235. Zargham M, Mahmoodi M, Mazdak H, et al. Evaluation of Therapeutic Effect of Intratrigonal Injection of AbobotulinumtoxinA(Dysport) and Hydrodistention in Refractory Interstitial Cystitis /Bladder Pain Syndrome. Urol J. Nov 23 2020;18(2):203-208. doi:10.22037/uj.v16i7.5879

Revision History Information

Revision History Date Revision History Number Revision History Explanation Reasons for Change
11/09/2025 R12

LCD posted for notice on 09/25/2025 to become effective 11/09/2025.

Proposed LCD posted for comment on 10/10/2024.

  • Reconsideration Request
03/21/2021 R11

LCD posted for notice on 02/04/2021. LCD becomes effective for dates of service on and after 03/21/2021.

09/24/2020 DL33274 Draft LCD posted for comment.

  • Creation of Uniform LCDs With Other MAC Jurisdiction
01/08/2019 R10

Revision Number: 8
Publication November 2019 Connection
LCR A/B2019-075 

Explanation of Revision: Based on Change Request (CR) 10901, the LCD was revised to remove all billing and coding and all language not related to reasonable and necessary provisions (“Bill Type Codes,” “Revenue Codes,” “CPT/HCPCS Codes,” “ICD-10 Codes that Support Medical Necessity,” “Documentation Requirements” and “Utilization Guidelines” sections of the LCD) and place them into a newly created billing and coding article. During the process of moving the ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes to the billing and coding article, the ICD-10-CM diagnosis code ranges were broken out and listed individually. In addition, the Social Security Act and IOM reference sections were updated. The effective date of this revision is for claims processed on or after January 8, 2019, for dates of service on or after October 3, 2018.

At this time 21st Century Cures Act will apply to new and revised LCDs that restrict coverage which requires comment and notice. This revision is not a restriction to the coverage determination and therefore not all the fields included on the LCD are applicable as noted in this LCD.

  • Other (Revision based on CR 10901)
11/15/2018 R9

Revision Number: 7
Publication: November 2018 Connection
LCR A/B2018-085

Explanation of Revision: Based on a LCD reconsideration request, the “Coverage Indications, Limitations, and/or Medical Necessity” section of the LCD under “FDA indications for Xeomin®:” was revised to add the FDA indication “chronic sialorrhea in adult patients”. Also, the “ICD-10 Codes that Support Medical Necessity” section of the LCD was revised to add ICD-10-CM diagnosis code K11.7 to the “Group 4 Codes” that support medical necessity for procedure code J0588 (Injection, incobotulinumtoxin A, 1 unit). In addition, the “Sources of Information” section of the LCD was updated to include the published source from the reconsideration request. This revision to the LCD is effective for claims processed on or after 11/15/2018, for dates of service on or after 07/03/2018.

11/15/2018:  At this time 21st Century Cures Act will apply to new and revised LCDs that restrict coverage which requires comment and notice. This revision is not a restriction to the coverage determination and therefore not all the fields included on the LCD are applicable as noted in this LCD.

  • Reconsideration Request
10/01/2018 R8

Revision Number: 6

Explanation of Revision: Based on CR 10847 (Annual 2019 ICD-10-CM Update), the LCD was revised to indicate that diagnosis codes were added and deleted within existing diagnosis code ranges. The effective date of this revision is based on date of service.

  • Revisions Due To ICD-10-CM Code Changes
05/03/2018 R7

Revision Number: 5

Publication: May 2018 Connection

LCR A/B2018-041

Explanation of revision:  Based on an LCD reconsideration request, this LCD was revised in the “Coverage Indications, Limitations, and/or Medical Necessity” section to include the FDA indications for Dysport® –the treatment of spasticity in adults and the treatment of lower limb spasticity in pediatric patients 2 years of age and older.  In addition, the accompanying diagnosis codes (G11.4, G80.8, G82.21-G82.22, G82.51-G82.52, G83.11-G83.14, I69.041-I69.044, I69.141-I69.144, I69.241-I69.244, I69.341-I69.344, I69.841-I69.844, M62.451-M62.452, M62.461-M62.462, M62.471-M62.472, M62.48, M62.49, M62.831, and M62.838) for these indications were added to the “ICD-10 Codes that Support Medical Necessity” section under “Group 2 Codes:” and the “Sources of Information and Basis for Decision” has also been updated. The LCD revision to include the treatment of lower limb spasticity in pediatric patients 2 years of age and older is effective for claims processed on or after May 3, 2018, for dates of service on or after 07/29/2016.  The LCD revision to include the treatment of spasticity in adults is effective for claims processed on or after May 3, 2018, for dates of service on or after June 14, 2017.

05/03/2018:  At this time 21st Century Cures Act will apply to new and revised LCDs that restrict coverage which requires comment and notice.  This revision is not a restriction to the coverage determination and therefore not all the fields included on the LCD are applicable as noted in this policy.

  • Reconsideration Request
02/08/2018 R6

Revision Number: 4

Publication: February 2018 Connection

LCR A/B2018-012

Explanation of revision:  This LCD has been revised to include an explanation that all the codes within the asterisked range from the first code to the last code apply  for ICD-10 code ranges in the “ICD-10 Codes that Support Medical Necessity” section of the LCD for procedure codes J0585, J0586 and J0588. In addition, the procedure codes in the “CPT/HCPCS Codes” section of the LCD were put in groups to be consistent with the groups in the “ICD-10 Codes that Support Medical Necessity” section of the LCD. The effective date of this revision is based on process date.

02/08/2018:  At this time 21st Century Cures Act will apply to new and revised LCDs that restrict coverage which requires comment and notice.  This revision is not a restriction to the coverage determination and therefore not all the fields included on the LCD are applicable as noted in this policy.

  • Provider Education/Guidance
  • Public Education/Guidance
06/09/2016 R5 Revision Number: 3
Publication: June 2016 Connection
LCR A/B2016-066

Explanation of revision: Based on an LCD reconsideration request, this LCD was revised to add ICD-10-CM codes G80.0, G80.1, G80.2, G82.53, G82.54, G83.0*, and ICD-10-CM code ranges G83.21-G83.24*, I69.031-I69.034, I69.051-I69.054, I69.131-I69.134, I69.151-I69.154, I69.231-I69.234, I69.251-I69.254, I69.331-I69.334, I69.351-I69.354, I69.831-I69.834, and I69.851-I69.854 under the “ICD-10 Codes that Support Medical Necessity” section of the LCD for procedure code J0586. Additionally, language clarifying the asterisked diagnoses was also added to this section. Also, “spasticity of the arm in patients following a stroke” was removed from the “Off-label Indications” section for Dysport™. The effective date of this revision is for dates of service on or after 06/09/16. This LCD was also revised to add ICD-10-CM code range G81.11-G81.14 under the “ICD-10 Codes that Support Medical Necessity” section of the LCD for procedure code J0588. The effective date of this revision is for claims processed on or after 06/09/16, for dates of service on or after 12/22/2015. In addition, based on an LCD reconsideration request, this LCD was revised to add ICD-10-CM codes G80.0, G80.1, G80.2, G82.53, G82.54, G83.0*, and ICD-10-CM code ranges G83.21-G83.24*, I69.031-I69.034, I69.051-I69.054, I69.131-I69.134, I69.151-I69.154, I69.231-I69.234, I69.251-I69.254, I69.331-I69.334, I69.351-I69.354, I69.831-I69.834, and I69.851-I69.854 under the “ICD-10 Codes that Support Medical Necessity” section of the LCD for procedure code J0588. The effective date of this revision is for dates of service on or after 06/09/16.
  • Typographical Error
06/09/2016 R4 Revision Number: 3
Publication: June 2016 Connection
LCR A/B2016-066

Explanation of revision: Based on an LCD reconsideration request, this LCD was revised to add ICD-10-CM codes G80.0, G80.1, G80.2, G82.53, G82.54, G83.0*, and ICD-10-CM code ranges G83.21-G83.24*, I69.031-I69.034, I69.051-I69.054, I69.131-I69.134, I69.151-I69.154, I69.231-I69.234, I69.251-I69.254, I69.331-I69.334, I69.351-I69.354, I69.831-I69.834, and I69.851-I69.854 under the “ICD-10 Codes that Support Medical Necessity” section of the LCD for procedure code J0586. Additionally, language clarifying the asterisked diagnoses was also added to this section. Also, “spasticity of the arm in patients following a stroke” was removed from the “Off-label Indications” section for Dysport™. The effective date of this revision is for dates of service on or after 06/09/16. This LCD was also revised to add ICD-10-CM code range G81.11-G81.14 under the “ICD-10 Codes that Support Medical Necessity” section of the LCD for procedure code J0588. The effective date of this revision is for claims processed on or after 06/09/16, for dates of service on or after 12/22/2015. In addition, based on an LCD reconsideration request, this LCD was revised to add ICD-10-CM codes G80.0, G80.1, G80.2, G82.53, G82.54, G83.0*, and ICD-10-CM code ranges G83.21-G83.24*, I69.031-I69.034, I69.051-I69.054, I69.131-I69.134, I69.151-I69.154, I69.231-I69.234, I69.251-I69.254, I69.331-I69.334, I69.351-I69.354, I69.831-I69.834, and I69.851-I69.854 under the “ICD-10 Codes that Support Medical Necessity” section of the LCD for procedure code J0588. The effective date of this revision is for dates of service on or after 06/09/16.
  • Typographical Error
06/09/2016 R3 Revision Number: 3
Publication: June 2016 Connection
LCR A/B2016-066

Explanation of revision: Based on an LCD reconsideration request, this LCD was revised to add ICD-10-CM codes G80.0, G80.1, G80.2, G82.53, G82.54, G83.0*, and ICD-10-CM code ranges G83.21-G83.24*, I69.031-I69.034, I69.051-I69.054, I69.131-I69.134, I69.151-I69.154, I69.231-I69.234, I69.251-I69.254, I69.331-I69.334, I69.351-I69.354, I69.831-I69.834, and I69.851-I69.854 under the “ICD-10 Codes that Support Medical Necessity” section of the LCD for procedure code J0586. Additionally, language clarifying the asterisked diagnoses was also added to this section. Also, “spasticity of the arm in patients following a stroke” was removed from the “Off-label Indications” section for Dysport™. The effective date of this revision is for dates of service on or after 06/09/16. This LCD was also revised to add ICD-10-CM code range G81.11-G81.14 under the “ICD-10 Codes that Support Medical Necessity” section of the LCD for procedure code J0588. The effective date of this revision is for claims processed on or after 06/09/16, for dates of service on or after 12/22/2015. In addition, based on an LCD reconsideration request, this LCD was revised to add ICD-10-CM codes G80.0, G80.1, G80.2, G82.53, G82.54, G83.0*, and ICD-10-CM code ranges G83.21-G83.24*, I69.031-I69.034, I69.051-I69.054, I69.131-I69.134, I69.151-I69.154, I69.231-I69.234, I69.251-I69.254, I69.331-I69.334, I69.351-I69.354, I69.831-I69.834, and I69.851-I69.854 under the “ICD-10 Codes that Support Medical Necessity” section of the LCD for procedure code J0588. The effective date of this revision is for dates of service on or after 06/09/16.
  • Revisions Due To ICD-10-CM Code Changes
03/29/2016 R2 Revision Number: 2
Publication: March 2016 Connection
LCR A/B2016-053

Explanation of revision: Based on an LCD reconsideration request, this LCD was revised to include the FDA indication for Xeomin® –upper limb spasticity in adult patients under the “Indications and Limitations of Coverage and/or Medical Necessity” section of the LCD. The effective date of this revision is for claims processed on or after 3/29/2016, for dates of service on or after 12/22/2015. This LCD was also revised based on LCD reconsideration request to include the FDA indication for Botox® - lower limb spasticity in adult patients under the “Indications and Limitations of Coverage and/or Medical Necessity” section. In addition “spastic hemiplegia”, and “spasticity related to stroke” were removed from the “Off label Indications for Botox®” and added to the “FDA Indications for Botox®” section of the LCD. Also, the ICD-10-CM codes G80.1, I69.061-I69.065, I69.161- I69.165, I69.261-I69.265 and I69.361-I69.365 were added under “ICD-10 Codes that Support Medical Necessity” for procedure code J0585. The effective date of this revision is for claims processed on or after 03/29/2016, for dates of service on or after 01/21/2016.
  • Reconsideration Request
02/23/2016 R1 Revision Number: 1
Publication: March 2016 Connection
LCR A/B2016-044

Explanation of revision: Based on an LCD reconsideration request, this LCD was revised to include FDA indication for Dysport— upper limb spasticity in adult patients under the Indications and Limitations of Coverage and/or Medical Necessity section of the LCD. The effective date of this revision is for claims processed on or after 02/23/2016, for dates of service on or after 07/15/15
  • Provider Education/Guidance
  • New/Updated Technology
N/A

Associated Documents

Attachments
N/A
Related National Coverage Documents
NCDs
N/A
Public Versions
Updated On Effective Dates Status
09/19/2025 11/09/2025 - N/A Currently in Effect You are here
01/29/2021 03/21/2021 - 11/08/2025 Superseded View
Some older versions have been archived. Please visit the MCD Archive Site to retrieve them.

Keywords

N/A

Read the LCD Disclaimer