National Coverage Analysis (NCA) Tracking Sheet

Positron Emission Tomography Scanner Technology

CAG-00090N

Issue

Our previous national coverage NCDs on PET scans (§50-36 of the Medicare Coverage Issues Manual) provided coverage for limited uses of FDG-PET. Further, it requires that the scans for these more limited indications be performed with a camera that has either been approved or cleared for marketing by the FDA to image radionuclides in the body.

In our consideration of a public request for expanded coverage of FDG-PET scans (# CAG-00065, decision memorandum dated 12/15/00), the majority of literature submitted was derived from imaging studies using full ring bismuth germanate (BGO) PET scanners. There were also published studies showing that some other scanner types may miss clinically important malignant lesions. Thus, in the new coverage decision we announced our intention to limit the new indications (described in the 12/15/00, decision memorandum) to high performance PET scanners with specific structural features.

It has come to our attention that there may be additional PET scanner systems with performance "equivalent to" or "better than" the scanners to which we are limiting the new indications. We have, therefore, internally generated a formal coverage request to examine the comparative performance of all system types approved for marketing by the FDA as PET scanners. This request will allow us to develop a uniform and appropriate quality standard for imaging systems that will be eligible for Medicare reimbursement for all covered uses of FDG-PET.

Information collected up until March 23, 2001, had illustrated a potentially greater gap in system performance than recognized as of December 15, 2000, between dedicated PET and gamma camera systems. Further, it is clear that no single design specification (i.e. crystal thickness) can differentiate a quality cut-off but, in fact, may require a performance-based standard. We are now exploring the magnitude and clinical importance of differences in image quality and acquisition time between dedicated full ring PET and camera-based systems.

On March 23, 2001, industry coupled with various academicians provided a substantial number of additional scientific studies that purportedly address the above concerns. Receipt of this new material has required us to extend until May 4, 2001, the finalized version of the National Coverage Determination on the gamma camera issue.

National Coverage Determinations

Benefit Category

Diagnostic Services in Outpatient Hospital

Requestor Information

Requestor Name Requestor Letter
HCFA internally generated request N/A
N/A

Important Dates

Formal Request Accepted and Review Initiated
01/10/2001
Expected NCA Completion Date
06/30/2001
Public Comment Period
02/09/2001 - 03/12/2001
Proposed Decision Memo Due Date
Proposed Decision Memo Released
Proposed Decision Memo Public Comment Period
Decision Memo Released
06/29/2001

Contacts

Lead Analysts
Stuart Caplan, RN
Lead Medical Officers
Michael Londner, M.D., MPH

Medicare Benefit Category Determination Date

Actions Taken

January 10, 2001

HCFA internally generated a formal coverage request.

March 20, 2001

Meeting with NEMA representatives and Industry.

March 23, 2001

Requested scientific data received by HCFA.

March 26, 2001

Meeting with (Steve Atkinson) to review provided data Conference call with representatives from the American College of Nuclear Medicine Physicians.

April 2, 2001

Follow-up conference call with representatives from the American College of Nuclear Medicine Physicians.

April 11, 2001

Extension until May 4, 2001.

April 12, 2001

April 11th tracking sheet retracted. Note the May 4th due date remains the same.

May 3, 2001

Received additional information from manufacturers.

May 4, 2001

Due date extended until May 18, 2001, in order to analyze additional information.

May 18, 2001

Due date extended until June 1, 2001.

June 1, 2001

Due date extended until June 15, 2001.

June 11, 2001

Due date extended until June 30, 2001.

June 29, 2001