Archive
API

Local Coverage Determination (LCD)

Magnetic Resonance Image Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) for Essential Tremor

L37761

Expand All | Collapse All
Proposed LCD
Proposed LCDs are works in progress that are available on the Medicare Coverage Database site for public review. Proposed LCDs are not necessarily a reflection of the current policies or practices of the contractor.

Document Note

Note History

Contractor Information

LCD Information

Document Information

Source LCD ID
N/A
LCD ID
L37761
Original ICD-9 LCD ID
Not Applicable
LCD Title
Magnetic Resonance Image Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) for Essential Tremor
Proposed LCD in Comment Period
N/A
Source Proposed LCD
DL37761
Original Effective Date
For services performed on or after 09/24/2018
Revision Effective Date
For services performed on or after 06/02/2024
Revision Ending Date
N/A
Retirement Date
N/A
Notice Period Start Date
04/18/2024
Notice Period End Date
06/01/2024

CPT codes, descriptions, and other data only are copyright 2024 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/HHSARS apply.

Fee schedules, relative value units, conversion factors and/or related components are not assigned by the AMA, are not part of CPT, and the AMA is not recommending their use. The AMA does not directly or indirectly practice medicine or dispense medical services. The AMA assumes no liability for data contained or not contained herein.

Current Dental Terminology © 2024 American Dental Association. All rights reserved.

Copyright © 2025, the American Hospital Association, Chicago, Illinois. Reproduced with permission. No portion of the AHA copyrighted materials contained within this publication may be copied without the express written consent of the AHA. AHA copyrighted materials including the UB‐04 codes and descriptions may not be removed, copied, or utilized within any software, product, service, solution, or derivative work without the written consent of the AHA. If an entity wishes to utilize any AHA materials, please contact the AHA at 312‐893‐6816.

Making copies or utilizing the content of the UB‐04 Manual, including the codes and/or descriptions, for internal purposes, resale and/or to be used in any product or publication; creating any modified or derivative work of the UB‐04 Manual and/or codes and descriptions; and/or making any commercial use of UB‐04 Manual or any portion thereof, including the codes and/or descriptions, is only authorized with an express license from the American Hospital Association. The American Hospital Association (the "AHA") has not reviewed, and is not responsible for, the completeness or accuracy of any information contained in this material, nor was the AHA or any of its affiliates, involved in the preparation of this material, or the analysis of information provided in the material. The views and/or positions presented in the material do not necessarily represent the views of the AHA. CMS and its products and services are not endorsed by the AHA or any of its affiliates.

Issue

Issue Description

This LCD outlines limited coverage for this service with specific details under Coverage Indications, Limitations and/or Medical Necessity.
Issue - Explanation of Change Between Proposed LCD and Final LCD

No changes were made from the proposed LCD that was presented for comment.

CMS National Coverage Policy

Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, §1862(a)(1)(A) allows coverage and payment for only those services that are considered to be reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member.

Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, §1862(a)(1)(D) research and experimental must be reasonable and necessary.

 

 

Coverage Guidance

Coverage Indications, Limitations, and/or Medical Necessity

This Local Coverage Determination (LCD) addresses use of Magnetic Resonance Guided Focused Ultrasound Surgery System (MRgFUS) for the treatment of neurologic conditions.

MRgFUS unilateral thalamotomy is considered medically reasonable and necessary in patients who have essential tremor (ET) and all of the following:

  1. Medication refractory ET (defined as refractory to at least 2 trials of medical therapy, including at least 1 first-line agent)
  2. Moderate to severe postural or intention tremor of the dominant hand (defined by a score of ≥2 on the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST))
  3. Disabling ET (defined by a score of ≥2 on any of the 8 items in the disability subsection of the CRST)
  4. Has failed deep brain stimulation (DBS) or is not able to tolerate the procedure due to other medical problems

MRgFUS unilateral thalamotomy is considered medically reasonable and necessary in patients who have Tremor-Dominant Parkinson’s disease (TDPD) and all of the following:

  1. Medication refractory TDPD, defined as refractory (or intolerant) to levodopa or levodopa equivalent medications (LEDD) ≥ 900 mg
  2. Parkinson’s disease (PD) with tremor-dominant subtype. This should generally be reflected by administering the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) in the on-medication state using the ratio of the mean score for tremor items (items 16, 20, and 21) to the mean postural instability/gait disorder score (items 13-15,29, and 30). A ratio of ≥ 1.5 indicates TDPD
  3. Severe and disabling tremor as indicated by documentation of specific activities in daily life that the patient is unable to perform or has substantial difficulty performing secondary to the tremor
  4. Has failed DBS or is not able to tolerate the procedure due to other medical problems

Limitations (not covered):

  1. Treatment of head or voice tremor
  2. Bilateral thalamotomy
  3. Conditions
    1. Unstable cardiac disease
    2. Coagulopathy
    3. Risk factors for deep-vein thrombosis
    4. Severe depression (defined by a score ≥20 on Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9))
    5. Cognitive impairment (defined by a score of <24 on the Mini–Mental State Examination)
    6. Previous brain procedure (transcranial magnetic stimulation, DBS, stereotactic lesioning, or electroconvulsive therapy)
    7. A skull density ratio (the ratio of cortical to cancellous bone) <0.4011,12
    8. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) contraindicated
Summary of Evidence

ET is a most common movement disorder affecting roughly 0.9% of individuals over age 65 years, though it can have a large range of symptom severity ranging from mildly symptomatic to sufficiently severe as to render an individual unable to self-feed.1 Although there are no curative therapies, symptoms of ET are often managed medically using a variety of available oral or injected treatments.1,2 For patients whose tremor is not adequately controlled medically, surgical treatment options are also available including stereotactic thalamotomy with radiofrequency (RF) ablation and DBS.1 Radiosurgery has also been described, though there is less data available on its efficacy.1 Both unilateral thalamotomy and DBS are acceptable surgical interventions for medically refractory ET, though DBS is thought to have fewer adverse events.3

MRgFUS has emerged as a potential non-invasive thalamotomy technique.

Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval for MRgFUS treatment of ET4 was based on its pivotal study, a prospective, double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial of MRgFUS to create a unilateral thalamic ablation for the treatment of ET, for which results were published in the peer reviewed literature.5 In this study, investigators examined the impact of the ExAblate® MRgFUS device in 76 patients with ET. There were 56 patients assigned to the treatment arm with ExAblate® and 20 patients assigned to the sham control group. Patients in the sham group could crossover to active treatment after 3 months, after initial effectiveness endpoints were assessed. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the change from baseline to 3 months in the on-medication upper limb tremor subscore of the Clinical Rating Scale for Tremor (CRST A+B) for the treated limb. The baseline CRST A+B score was 18.4 in the treatment group and 16.0 in the sham group. The CRST A+B score improved 47% by 3 months in the treatment group and 0.01% in the sham group with a between group difference of 8.3 (P < 0.001). The between group difference persisted at 12 months. Following the initial 3 month outcome assessment, 19 of the 20 patients originally randomized to the sham group and 2 patients randomized to MRgFUS, in whom the procedure was not completed crossed over to receive MRgFUS treatment. The mean baseline CRST A+B score at crossover in this group was 16.5, but 3 months after the crossover, the mean dropped to 7.4 (P <0.001), similar to the 3 month outcomes in the group originally allocated to treatment.

Following the FDA approval of MRgFUS for ET, MRgFUS for unilateral thalamotomy was approved by the FDA for the treatment of medication-refractory TDPD.6,7 Research has suggested that the pathophysiology of TDPD may be different from the pathophysiology of PD in patients affected primarily by rigidity and bradykinesia.8 Additionally, a unique medication strategy is often indicated for TDPD, but for refractory patients, surgery may be considered.9

In a study patterned off of the study used in FDA approval of MRgFUS for ET, investigators studied the impact of the ExAblate® MRgFUS device in 27 patients with TDPD.6,7 There were 20 patients assigned to the treatment arm and 7 patients assigned to the sham control group. Patients in the sham group could crossover to active treatment after 3 months, after initial effectiveness endpoints were assessed. The patients in the treatment arm received a unilateral MRgFUS thalamotomy. The primary efficacy outcome measure was the change from baseline to 3 months in the on-medication upper limb tremor subscore of the CRST A+B for the treated limb. The baseline CRST A+B score was 17 (range of 10.5-27.5) in the treatment group and 23 (range of 14-27) in the sham group. The CRST A+B score improved 62% by 3 months in the treatment group and 22% in the sham group (p = 0.04). The investigators also noticed improvements in efficacy secondary outcome measures at 3 months including the CRST, UPDRS, and PD Questionnaire-39 in the treatment group. Following the initial 3 month outcome assessment, 6 of the 7 patients originally randomized to the sham group crossed over to receive MRgFUS treatment. The median baseline CRST A+B score at crossover in these 6 was 21, but 3 months after the sham group crossed over, the median dropped to 5.5, similar to the 3 month outcomes in the group originally allocated to treatment. The investigators also considered the 1 year outcome of response in on-medication CRST A+B score. Of the 20 patients enrolled in the treatment group, 14 were unblended for 1 year assessments, and the median CRST was 5. Among the sham patients who crossed over, the median CRST was 6 at 1 year.

Additionally, MRgFUS is currently being studied for use in medically-refractory dyskinesia symptoms or motor fluctuations of advanced PD as part of a study registered at clinicaltrials.gov.10 This study does not yet have results available, so evidence from it was not reviewed.
Analysis of Evidence (Rationale for Determination)

When making coverage determinations, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) and Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) generally evaluate relevant clinical evidence to determine whether or not the evidence is of sufficient quality to support a finding that an item or service falling within a benefit category is reasonable and necessary for the diagnosis or treatment of illness or injury or to improve the functioning of a malformed body member. The critical appraisal of the evidence enables us to determine to what degree we are confident that: 1) the specific assessment questions can be answered conclusively; and 2) the intervention will improve health outcomes for beneficiaries. An improved health outcome is 1 of several considerations in determining whether an item or service is reasonable and necessary.

MRgFUS is a treatment approach that relies on high-intensity focused ultrasound delivered with Magnetic Resonance (MR) guidance. It can be used to ablate specific deep brain structures non-invasively. While, long term effectiveness and safety have not been studied, the use of this technology to non-invasively ablate structures for which surgical ablation is considered an accepted treatment approach suggests that this technology would have a similar therapeutic effect as surgical approaches to the ablation of these regions of the brain. In the background of this bioplausibility, clinical trials have been performed to study the outcomes achieved from treating of patients with neurological conditions with MRgFUS. Efficacy of this therapeutic technique has been specifically demonstrated when MRgFUS is used for unilateral thalamotomy (ventralis intermedius) for ET and for TDPD. We did not find any high quality head-to-head studies comparing MRgFUS to existing surgical techniques, so we are unable to definitively conclude how it compares to these treatment methods.

This appears to be an evolving area of research with at least 1 other ongoing study for the use of this technology in neurologic disease. This A/B MAC will continue to monitor scientific developments, and may adjust this coverage policy in accordance.

Proposed Process Information

Synopsis of Changes
Changes Fields Changed
N/A
Associated Information
Sources of Information
Bibliography
Open Meetings
Meeting Date Meeting States Meeting Information
N/A
Contractor Advisory Committee (CAC) Meetings
Meeting Date Meeting States Meeting Information
N/A
MAC Meeting Information URLs
N/A
Proposed LCD Posting Date
Comment Period Start Date
Comment Period End Date
Reason for Proposed LCD
Requestor Information
This request was MAC initiated.
Requestor Name Requestor Letter
View Letter
N/A
Contact for Comments on Proposed LCD

Coding Information

Bill Type Codes

Code Description

Please accept the License to see the codes.
N/A

Revenue Codes

Code Description

Please accept the License to see the codes.
N/A

CPT/HCPCS Codes

Expand All | Collapse All

Please accept the License to see the codes.

N/A

ICD-10-CM Codes that Support Medical Necessity

Expand All | Collapse All

Group 1

Group 1 Paragraph:

N/A

 Group 1 Codes:

N/A

N/A

ICD-10-CM Codes that DO NOT Support Medical Necessity

Expand All | Collapse All

Group 1

Group 1 Paragraph:

N/A

 Group 1 Codes:

N/A

N/A

Additional ICD-10 Information

General Information

Associated Information

Documentation Requirements

Documentation supporting medical necessity should be legible, maintained in the patient’s medical record and made available to the A/B MAC upon request. 

ICD-10-CM diagnosis codes supporting medical necessity must be submitted with each claim. Claims submitted without such evidence will be denied as not medically necessary.

Any diagnosis submitted must have documentation in the patient’s record to support coverage and medical necessity.
Sources of Information
N/A
Bibliography
  1. Schneider SA, Deuschl G. The treatment of tremor. Neurotherapeutics. 2014;11(1):128-138.
  2. Zesiewicz TA, Elble RJ, Louis ED, et al. Evidence-based guideline update: Treatment of essential tremor: Report of the Quality Standards subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2011;77(19):1752-1755.
  3. Zesiewicz T, Elble R, Louis E, et al. Practice parameter: Therapies for essential tremor: Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 2005;64(12):2008-2020.
  4. Food and Drug Administration. Exablate Model 4000 Types 1.0 System Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data. July 11, 2016. Accessed 11/6/23.
  5. Elias WJ, Lipsman N, Ondo WG, et al. A randomized trial of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor. New Engl J Med. 2016;375(8):730-739.
  6. Bond AE, Shah BB, Huss DS, et al. Safety and efficacy of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for patients with medication-refractory, tremor-dominant Parkinson disease: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(12):1412-1418.
  7. Food and Drug Administration. Exablate Model 4000 Types 1.0 and 1.1 System Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data. December 16, 2018. Accessed 11/6/23.
  8. Bergman H, Deuschl G. Pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease: From clinical neurology to basic neuroscience and back. J Movement Disorders. 2002;17(S3):S28-S40.
  9. Connolly BS, Lang AE. Pharmacological treatment of Parkinson disease: A review. JAMA. 2014;311(16):1670-1683.
  10. InSightec. ExAblate Pallidotomy for Medically-Refractory Dyskinesia Symptoms or Motor Fluctuations of Advanced Parkinson's Disease. June 18, 2019. Accessed 11/6/23.
  11. Food and Drug Administration. Exablate Model 4000 Type 1.0 and 1.1 System (“Exablate Neuro”) approval letter. August 11, 2021. Accessed 11/6/23.
  12. Pouratian N, Baltuch G, Elias WJ, et al. American society for stereotactic and functional neurosurgery position statement on magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound for the management of essential tremor. Neurosurgery. 2020;87:E126-E129.

Revision History Information

Revision History Date Revision History Number Revision History Explanation Reasons for Change
06/02/2024 R5

This LCD is being presented for notice. No changes were made from the proposed LCD that was presented for comment.
  • Provider Education/Guidance
  • Reconsideration Request
08/13/2020 R4

Under Coverage Indications, Limitations and/or Medical Necessity added hyperlink for FDA indications and changed verbiage under second and third paragraphs to read “4. Has failed deep brain stimulation or is not able to tolerate the procedure due to other medical problems”. Under Bibliography changes were made to citations to reflect AMA citation guidelines. Formatting, punctuation and typographical errors were corrected throughout the LCD. Acronyms were inserted where appropriate throughout the LCD. The registered mark was added to ExAblate® where applicable throughout the LCD.

At this time 21st Century Cures Act will apply to new and revised LCDs that restrict coverage which requires comment and notice. This revision is not a restriction to the coverage determination; and, therefore not all the fields included on the LCD are applicable as noted in this policy.
  • Provider Education/Guidance
02/10/2020 R3

No revisions were made as no comments were received from the provider community.
  • Provider Education/Guidance
10/24/2019 R2

This LCD is being revised in order to adhere to CMS requirements per chapter 13, section 13.5.1 of the Program Integrity Manual, to remove all coding from LCDs. There has been no change in coverage with this LCD revision. Title XVIII of the Social Security Act, §1833(e) was removed from the CMS National Coverage Policy section of this LCD and placed in the related Billing and Coding: Magnetic Resonance Image Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) for Essential Tremor A56690 article. Formatting, punctuation and typographical errors were corrected throughout the LCD.

At this time 21st Century Cures Act will apply to new and revised LCDs that restrict coverage which requires comment and notice. This revision is not a restriction to the coverage determination; and, therefore not all the fields included on the LCD are applicable as noted in this policy.

 
  • Provider Education/Guidance
07/11/2019 R1

All coding located in the Coding Information section has been moved into the related Billing and Coding: Magnetic Resonance Image Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MRgFUS) for Essential Tremor A56690 article and removed from the LCD. Under Bibliography changes were made to citations to reflect AMA citation guidelines. Formatting, punctuation and typographical errors were corrected throughout the LCD. Acronyms were inserted where appropriate throughout the LCD.

At this time 21st Century Cures Act will apply to new and revised LCDs that restrict coverage which requires comment and notice. This revision is not a restriction to the coverage determination; and, therefore not all the fields included on the LCD are applicable as noted in this policy.

 
  • Provider Education/Guidance
N/A

Associated Documents

Attachments
N/A
Related National Coverage Documents
NCDs
N/A
Public Versions
Updated On Effective Dates Status
04/10/2024 06/02/2024 - N/A Currently in Effect You are here
Some older versions have been archived. Please visit the MCD Archive Site to retrieve them.

Keywords

  • MRgFUS

Read the LCD Disclaimer

Submit Feedback/Ask a Question